I CASES REPORTED. Page ° Page James, Planters’ Transp. Co. v.` .... 21 Magone, Conant v .... . ........ . . . 578 J. B. Pace Tobacco Co., Weller v. . 860 Manchester, Morss v ......,... . .... 282 Jenkins v. Ferguson .... . . .... . .... 398 Manhattan Ry. Co., Van Wickle v.. 278 Jenkins v. Stetson .... . ............ 398 Manley v. Olney ................... 708 J. L. Pendergast, The, Chisholm v.. 415 Mann, United States v ...... . . . .. .. 386 John K. Shaw, The .... . ........... 491 Manning, Seibert Cylinder Oil·Cup John K. Shaw, The, Raphael v. .... 491 Co. v. . . ............ . . . . .... . . . . 625 Joice v. Canal-Boats Nos. 1,758 and Marckwald, Cornely v ...... . ...... 292 1,892 ........ . ................... 553 Mariel, The .... . ........... .... 103 ` Jonasson, Landesmann v.' ........ . . 590 Mariel, The, Gritfin v ...... . ....... 103 Jones, United States v .... . ........ 482 Marine City Stave Co. v. Herresholf Jones, United States v. . . . .... . .... 569 Manuf’g Co .... . ................. 822 Jordan, Schutz v ................... 55 Marinin, The ......... . .... . ..... .. 918 Judah v. Iowa. Barb—Wire Co- ...... 561 Marinin. The, Read v ...... . ....... 918 Judges of Scotland County, United Marshall v. Turnbull .... . .......... 124 States v. .................... . .... 714 May v. County of Saginaw .... . .... 629 McClung v. Steen .... . . . . .... . ..... 373 Kanawha, The ..................... 240 McDonald v. Cooper ....... .. . . . . 745 Kanawha, The, Higgins v .... . . .... 240 McKenna v. The Carolina .... . ..... 112 Kansas City, Ft. S. & G. R. Co., McMorran v. The Grecian Monarch 635 State v. ............ . ............. 722 McNab v. Nathan Manuf’g Co. ..... 155 Kansas City, S. &M. R. Co..Davis v.. 863 Memphis & L. R. R. Co., Dow v .... 185 , Kansas City Times Co., Edwards v.. 813 Merritt v. One Case of Wool .... . . . 111 Kearney v. Lehigh Val. R. Co. .... . 320 Meyers v. Busby ......... . . . . ...... 670 Kelley, Spencer v ...... . ........... 838 Middleton v. Bankers’ & Merchants' KellyMercantileCo.,Pfanschmidtv. 667 Tel. Co ........ . ................. 524 Kenilworth, The ...... . ............ 486 Miller v. The Maggie P. .... . . . . .... 300 Kenilworth, The, Baker Whitely Miller, Toplitz v .... . . . . .... . . ..... 744 Coal Co. v ................... . . . . 486 Mills v. Hurd ........ . ............. 127 Kiernan v. The Norma ........ . .... 411 Mills v. The America ....... . .. ..... 845 A Kiesele v. Haas .... . ..... . ......... 79-1 Mischief, The. Hunt v. .... . . . ..... 304 Kissane, Chemical Nat. Bank v .... 429 Mitchell, Smith v.. . .. . ............ 680 ` Molecular Telephone Co., American La Bau, Welling v ................. 293 Bell Telephone Co. v .... . ...... . . 214 Laird v. City of De Soto. .... . .... .. 652 Moore v. Town of Edgeneld. ....... 498 Lancaster, Wyman v ........... . . . . 720 Moran v. Pittsburgh, C. & St. L. Ry. Landesmann v. Jonasson. .... . ..... 590 C0 ............................... 878 Lawrence, Reed v .......... . .... .. 228 Moran v. The Hackensack .... . .... 800 Lazensky v. Supreme Lodge Knights Morgan’s Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. of Honor ...... . ......... . ....... 417 Co. v; Texas Cent. Ry. Co .... .. . . 525 Leary v. Hohenstein ............... 832 Morrison, Williams v .... . . .... . . .. 177 Leatherbury v. United States. .... . . 780 Morrison, Williams v. ..... . . ...... 682 Leavenworth v. Peppgar .... . . . . .... 718 Morrissey, United States v .... . .... 147 Lehigh Val. R. Co., earney v ..... 320 Morss v. Manchester ............... 282 Leroy v. Doe ................ . ..... 516 Moxie Nerve Food Co. v. Baum· , Lewis v. Sixty-Five Packages of bach .... . .............. . . . . ...... 205 Merchandise. .... . ............... 111 Mndgett v. The Raleigh .... . ....... 633 Lockwood, Hill v .... . . . .. .... . . . . 389 Mullaney, United States v .... . ..... 370 Lookout Mountain R. Co. v. Houston 711 Mullanphy Planing-Mill Co., Gould A Lorie v. North Chicago City Ry. Co.. 270 v. .... . ............... . . . . ....... 181 Loud v. The Doris Eckhoif. .... . . . . 555 Murphy, United States v .... . . ..... 376 Loud v. The Greenpoint. .... . ...... 799 Ludwig, In re .... .. .... . . . . .... .. . . 774 Nashua Lock Co. v. Norwich Lock Lundberg v. Albany & Rensselaer Manuf1;gCo ...... . ............... 87 ` Iron & Steel Co ...... . ......... .. 501 Nathan anuf’g Co., McNab v ..... 155 A Neal, The Alameda v .... . . .... . .. . 331 Mackey. Heckman v. .............. 574 Negus v. The Georgia .... . . ....... 637 Mackintosh v. Flint & P. M. R. Co., 350 Neuman. In re .... . ................ 805 Macon, Glenn v .... . .............. 7 Newcomb. In re .... . . . . .... . ...... 826 Maggie P., The .... . .... .. ..... ·. 300 New England Car Trust, French Maggie P., The, Miller v. . . . . . .... 300 Spiral Spring Co. v ............... 44 Maginnis Oil & Soap Works, New New Haven Horse-Nail Co., Ausa· Orleans Water-Works C0. v .... . . 5 ble Horse·Nail Co. v.. ...... . ..... 92 Magone, Avis v . . . .... . ....... . . . . 578 New Haven Nail C0., Ausable Magone, Castner v .... . .... .. .. .... 578 Horse-Nail Co. v. .... . ....... . .. . 92