X11 CASES REPORTED.
Paxe Page
St. Louis Wire-Mill Co. v. Consoli— Straits of Gibraltar, The, Driscoll v. 297
dated Barb·Wire C0 ......... ;‘..—. 802 Straits of Gibraltar, The, Hicks v.. . 297
St. Paul Plow-Works, Starling v. .. 290 Straus, Halstedv ..... .. ........ .... 279
St. Paul, S. 80 T. F. Ry. C0., Hast- Strauss v. Abrahams ............... 810
ings & D. Ry. Co. v .... . . .... . . . . 821 Sullivan Machine Co.,American Dia-
Saranac Horse-Nail Co., Ausable mond Drill Co. v ................. 552
Horse-Nail Co. v., two cases. ..... ‘ 94 Sulpreme Lodge Knights of Honor,
Sawyer Crystal Blue Co. v. Hub- azensky v .......... . .. . . . ...... 417
bard ................... .. ....   388 Sylvester v. Danziger .... . .. . .... .. 1
Schell, Grandmange v ..... . ....... 655
Schmieder v. Barney. . . . .. . ..... .. . 657 Tangler, The. .... . .... . .... . . . . .... 230
. Schneider, Wright v .... . . . .. ...... 705 Tanite Co., Densmore v .... . ....... 544
Scholneld v. United States.. . .... . . 576 Tenk, Stewart v .... . . .... . . ........ 665
Schutz v. Jordan Q. . .... . . ...... .. . 55 Texas Cent. Ry. Co., Farmers' Loan
Scotland County Court, Hill v.. .... 716 & Trust Co. v ................ . . . . 525
Seibert Cylinder 0il·Cup Co. v.Man- Texas Cent. Ry. Co., Morgan’s
ning .... . ..   ...... . ............. 625 Louisiana & TQ R. do S. S. C0. v. . 525
Seibert Cylinder Oil·Cup C0. v. Texas Western Ry. Co., Farmers'
N&ghtingale ..... . . .... . .. . . .. . . . 171 Loan & Trust C0. v ...... . ....... 359
Sen , The C. H .... . . .......... . . . . 237 Texas & St.. L. Ry. Co., Central
Shaw,TheJohn·K .... ... .... ...... 491 Trust Co.v ....   ....   ....   448 _
Sheldon v. Wheeler .... . ........... 773 Thaxtcr v. Boston Electric C0 ..... . 833
Sherman v. Hedden ........ ........ 756 Thomas P. Ball, The ....... . ........ 847
Sherman v. Hedden ....... . ........ 757 Thompson v. Derby ............ . . . . 830
Sherwood v. Roundtree .... .. ...... 113 Thomson v. Smith & Griggs Mau·
Siebert Cylinder Oil-Cup Co. v. uf’g Co .... . .. .... . ....... .. .... 791
Boggs.. .... . ..................... 790 Thornburn v. Doscher. ............. 810
Simons, Exlparte .... . . . .. ......... 681 Toplitz v. Miller .............. . .... 744
Sixty-Five ackages of Merchan- Torrent v. Duluth Lumber Co. ..... 229
dise, Lewis v. .... . . .... . ...... ... 111 Town of Edgeiield, Moore v ..... ... 498
Slenker, United States v .... . .... .. 691 Town of Ontario, Butterneld v ..... 891
Slyiield v. Healy .... . .... . .... ..... 2 Turnbull, Marshall v ..... ...... ..... 124
Smith v. Harpending ......... .. . . . 645 Turner, Ex parte.. . . .. .. .. . . . ...... 872
Smith v. Havemeyer .... ... . . .... .. 844
Smith, Hill v .... . . ............ . . . . 753 Union Needle Co., Excelsior Needle
Smith v. Hively.... ....... ......... 680 Co. v .... . ...........   ....   221
Smith v. Mitchell ...... . ....... . .. . 680 Union Paper-Bag M. Co., New York
Smith & Griggs Maunf’gC0.,Th0m· Paper-Bag M. Co. v ...... . . . . .... 783
son v ...... . . ........ . ....... . .. 791 United Statesv. American Bell Tele-
. Societa Auonima Agrnmaria di phone Co .... . . . . .... . . . ......... 591
Navigazione v. Angler ....... . . . . 230 United States v. Brandestein ....... 738
South arolina R. Co., Coghlan v.. . 317 United States v. Carroll .... . .. .. .. . 775
Southern Pac. R. C0. v. Davis. .... 451 United States v. Chamberlain. .... .. 777
Southern Pac. R. C0. v. Orton. .... 457 United States v. Colgate ...... ...... 624
Southern Pac.vR. Co. v. Poole ..... 451 United States v. Coy.. .... ..... .... 538 ·
Sowles, Wittersv .... .. .... . . . .... . 130 United States v. Freyberg. .. .... .. . 195
Sowles, Wittersv .................. 758 United States v. Glover .... . . . ..... 142
Sowles, Wittersv. . . ........... ... . 762 United States v. Harrison, two cases 386
Sowles, Witters v .... .... ........... 765 United States, Hayes v ........ ..... 662
Sowles, Witters v. .. .... ........... 766 United States v. Jones ....... ...... 482
Sowles, Witters v. .. ....... ... .. ... 767 United States v. J0nes.[. .... . . . .. . 569
Sowles, Witters v. . . .. . .. ...... . ... 771 United States v. Judges of Scotland
Spencer v. Kelley,.   ....   .... 838 Co. .... . ............... .......... 714
Spies v. Chicago & E. I. R. Co.. ... 713 United States, Leatherburyv ....... 780
Spraker v. The Alfredo ......... ... 240 United States v. Mann ....... . ...... 386
Starling v. St. Paul Plow-Works .... 290 United States v. Morrissey. ......... 147
State v. Kansas City, Ft. S. & G. R. United States v. Mullaney .......... 370
Co. .... . . . . .... . ...... . .... . . .... 722 United States v. Murphy ........... 376
Steen, McClung v .................. 373 United States v. Owen .... .. . ...... 534
` Stein v. Bienville Water Supply Co.. 876 United States v. Pearson ........... 309
Stephenson, Barbour v... . .... .. .... 66 United States v. Pendergast ........ 198
Stetson, Jenkins v .... ‘. .... . . . ...... 398 United States v. Reichert. . ......... 142
Stewart v. Tenk .................... 665 United States, Rogersv .... . . .. .. ... 890
Stockton v. Baltimore & N.Y. R. Co. 9 United States, Scholtield v. . . .... .. . 576
Straits of Gibraltar, The ........... 297 United States v. Slenker... . . . .... .. 691