XVI CASES REPORTED.
Page Page
Wallace. The' ...... . ............... 672 Leary v. Hohenstein ...............  
Withcofsky v. Wier ....... . . . ...... 301 Ludwig, In re ..., . ......... . ....... 774
1, 1 Lundbergwv. Albany & Rensselaer
CIRCUIT COURT- N D· New YM ·· M§§?.'$f?i?§¥F<‘?:1 1t111:1 :1:111;;; ifié
1 ii . · _ v_ McNab v. Nathan Manufg Co ...... 155 _
A137g;);;-NIlI1?1rCi>?F $$:0 Egses.   94 New Y<>r1<.B¤1¤¤e Nv P· <><>- v· New __
Ausable Horse-Nail Co, v. Saranac ‘ ‘ ‘5]°TS€5' C9? SPFWE & R· C0 ··•···· 7f’*’
\ Hornoyoii Co, two onsos __ _ ___ Q4 Niagara, The ......... _ . .. .... . ..... 334
_ Buaemeid V. Town of ontario ..... 891 0r¢e<>¤ & Tr¤¤¤<=¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤1 C0- V· 0
·Hni.SWoni l\_[anuf'g go_ v_ Davis Northern Pac. R. Co ..... . ....... 4~8
s. M. oe. ....   .... . .... . .... 401 Pm V-Welt ·--- ni ---·-·--·- ·- ---- *41
Vina] v_ Continental Congtructign Read v. The Marinm ............... 918
so [inn Co ___________ _ ____ _ ______ 343 Rickard v. Barney ................. 581
warren v. Burnham. .... . .......... me News V- U¤it¤<1 Stews -··-·· · ···- - §90
Wim->1erv.Hm ........ . ....... . . .. ve Ry¤¤_v- G<>¤1d· -·-- ·- --··· - ---··--- M
Schm1ede13v.(Barney. .... . . ...... . . (ig;
Schutz v. or an .... . ........ .. .. .
DISTRICT Comm N· D· NEW YORK Seibert Cylinder Oil-Cup Co. v.Man— 6g_
. nin ...... . ......... . .... . ....... o
N°w°°mb· In r° ‘·*· ‘ ‘‘‘‘··‘ · ••··•‘ 826 Sherrgan v. Heddon ..... . .......... 756
_ Sherman v. Heddon. .... . . ......... 757
Cracow Couar, S. D. New Yom:. Siebert Cylinder Oil-Cup Oo. v.
y Beggs.. ........... . . . ............ 790
American Bell Telephone Co. v. Spies v. Chicago & E. I. R. Co ..... 713
Molecular Telephone Co .... L .... 214 Toplitz v. Miller ........ . ...... . . . . 744
American Diamond Drill Co. v. Sul- n United States v. Colgate ............ 624
livan Machine Co.   . ..... . ..... 552 United States v. Pearson ........ . . . 309
American Zylonite C0. v. Celluloid Van Wickle v. Manhattan Ry. Co. . 278
Manuf’g Co .... .. .... . . . .. . .... .. 809 Weller v. J. B. Pace Tobacco C0. . . 860
Anderson v. Appleton .... . . ....... 855 Welling v. La Bau ...... . . . .... . . . . 293
gvig v. Maggne ....   ....   538
a win v. onway 0 ........ . . 5 D Tm T, 5_ _ NEW Yom;
— . Bell v. United States Stamping Co. . 549 IB CT COUB D
Bourke v. Amison ...... . . . . ....... 710 America, The .... . . . . .............. 845
Canima, The .... . . . . .... . ......... . 302 Ang·lo—Australasian Steam Nav. Co.
Castner v. Magone. .......... . ..... 578 v. Cornell Steam-Boat C0 ........ 798
Chicopee Folding Box Co. v. Rogers 695 Berwind Coal Co. v. The Raritan. . 847
· Chisholm v. The J. L. Pendergastn 415 Brantford Ci?, The ............... 324
Collins v. The Flushing .... . . . . .... 334 C. H. Seuif, T e .............. . ..... 237
Conant v. Magone ........ . . . . ..... 5'78 Doris Eckhoi, The .... . . . .. ....... 555
Cornely v. Marckwald. .... . . . .. . . .. 292 Edwin Baxter. The .... , . .... . . .... 296
’ Cummings, In re .... . . . . ........... 75 Hathaway v. The Brantford City. . . 324
Dieckerhoif v. Robertson .... . ..... 73 Joice v. Caual·Boats Nos. 1,758 and
Dieckerhoflf v. Robertson .... . ..... 758 1,892 ........ . . ...... . ...... . .... 553
Dow v. Memphis do L. R. R. Co. .... 185 Kiernau v. The Norma. .... . ...... . 411
Dwyer v. Peshall .... . ......... . . . . 497 Loud v. The Doris Eckholf .... . .... 555
Edward Barr Co. v. New York 80 Mills v. The America. ....... .... .... 845
N. H. Automatic Sprinkler Co .... 79 Mudgett v. The Raleinhr .... . . ...... 633
Excelsior Needle C0. v. Union New York, L. E. & . R. C0. v.
Needle Co.. . . .... . . ..... . .. .. .... 221 { The C. H. Seuli? .... . ............. 237
Flushing, The .... . . . .... . ........ .. 334 Norma, The .... . . .... . . ...... . . . .. 411
Grandmange v. Schell .... . . . . ..... 655 Olga, The .... . .......... . .... . .... 329 ·
Guyot v. Hilton ........ . ..... . ..... 743 •Park v. The Hull ofthe Edwin Bax-
Harland v. Bankers’ & Merchants’ ter. .... . .................. . ..... 296
Tel. Co,. .... . ........... . ........ 305 Pedersen v. Pagenstecher ...... . . . . 841
Heckman v. Macke ......... . ..... 574 Raleigh, The ....... . ...... . . . .... . 633
Heideckerv. Red Star Line Steam- Rambler, The. . . .. .. . . .. . .......... 847
ShipCo...., .... .. ...... . ....   706 Raritan, The ..... ...... ............ 847
Herklotz v. Chase .... . .......... . . . 433 Revere Copper Co. v. The Olga .... 329
1 Hicks v. Beardsley .... . ....... . .... 281 Smith v. Havemeyer .......... . .... 844
Kiesele v. Haas .... . . . ........ . .... 794 Societa Anonima Agrumaria di
Landesmann v. J onasson ........... 590 Navigazione v. Angier .... . .... ;. 230
Lazensky v. Supreme Lodge Knights Tangier, The. .... . . . . .... . . .... . . . . 230
of Honor ...... . . ................ 417 Thomas P. Ball, The.   . . ......... 847