X CASES REPORTED. Page Page Liebenroth v. Robertson. .... . ..... 457 Morse Arms Manuf’g Co., Winches— Lindquest v. Union Pac. Ry. Co. . . 372 ter Repeating Arm Co. v .... . . .. . 170 Lingerfelter, Tuttle v .... . . .... ... . 352 Moulton v. Leighton, two cases. .... 143 Linklatenv. The Gazelle ........... 301 Moxie.Nerve Food Co. v. Beach .... 248 Lloyd, Booth v .... . ......... ..... . 593 Moxie Nerve Food Co. v. Clark .... . 248 Looker v. Hyman ........ . . .. .. .... 313 Moxie Nerve Food Co. v. Dunn .... 248 Loomis v. New York & Cleveland Moxie Nerve Food Co. v. Fairbanks 248 Gas Coal Co ........... . ......... 353 Moxie Nerve Food Co. v. Harlan. . . 248 Lord v. The Hiram R. Dixon .... . . 297 Moxie Nerve Food Co. v. Smith, two Louisville & N. R. Co., United cases .... . .......... . ........ . .. . 248 States v ........ . ..... . . ...... . . . 829 Moxie Nerve Food Co. v. Tuttle .... 248 Lynn Gas-Light Co., Higgins v .... 295 Moy Chee Kee, In re ........ .. ..... 377 Lyons, Lacroix v .... . ..... . ....... 437 Myers Sanitary Depot, Huber v... . . 48 Maggie M., The .... . ......... . . . .. . 591 l National Bank of Rutland v. Hank- Maggie M., The, Robinson v. ....... 591 ‘ inson .... . . .... . ...... . . . . .... . . 561 Mahone v. Southern Tel. Co.. .... .. 702 l National Home for Disabled Vol- Maiden City, The ................ .. 715 unteer Soldiers v. Butler. . ....... 374 Maiden City, The, Gastover v ...... 715 National S. S. Co., Abbott v .... . . .. 895 Manatee, The ...... . ...... . .. .... 585 Naylor v. New York Cent. & H. R. Manatee,. The, Mclntire v ........ .. . 585 R. Co. .... . ......... . . .. . ........ 801 Markell, Pitkin Co ty Min. Co. v. 386 Nelson v. Hennessey ............... 113 Martin, Acme Hay Hxarvesting Co. v. 249 Neumark, Eaton v ...... . ..... . .... 891 Martin, Tuttle v. .............. . . . .. 352 New England Mortgage Security Co. Mast, Buford & Burwell Co., How- v. Gay. .... . . .. .......... . ....... 636 ard v ................ . ..... . .. . . .. 867 Newgass v. City of New Orleans... 199 Mather v. Jarel ........ . . .... . ..... 366 New Orleans, B. R. & V. R. Co., Matthews v. Iron Clad Manuf’g Co. 350 Parker v ........ . . .... . . .... . . . . 693 Matthews v. Warner. .... . ......... 369 New Orleans Packing & Canning McBride v. Gwynn .... . . . .. . . . .... 402 Co., Garrity v .... . . . . ........... 196 McClain v. Ortmayer .... . ..... 284 New York Cent. & H. R. R. Co., McColley v. The Brabo. .... . . . .... . 884 Naylor v ........ . .... . .......... 801 McConaughy, United States v. . . . . 168 New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., Rob- McConaughy, United States v. ..... 170 ostelli v. .. .... .. ........... . . . . 796 McConnaughy v. Bennett,. .... .... 455 New York & Cleveland Gas Coal McConnaugl1y v. Boyd .... . ....... 455 Co., Loomis v ........ . . . .... . .... 353 McConnaughy v. Hill. ....... . . . .. . 455 Nonce v. Richmond &; D. R. Co .... 429 McConnaughy v. Morrow .... . ..... 455 Non Pareillo, The ............,..... 524 McConnaughy v. Sloane . . . . .... . . . 455 Non Pareille, The, Zeller v. .... . . . . 524 McConnaughy v.. Wiley .... . .. . . .. . 449 Nordlinger v. Robertson. . ........ 241 Mclntire v. The Manatee .... . . .... . 585 North German Lloyd, Heye v .... . . 60 McTammany, Kennedy v .... . . .... 584 Merrill, Bliss v. ............... . . . . 39 Omaha Horse-Ry. Co. v. Cable Mershon. City Bank of Boone v. . . 240 Tram-Way Co .... . . . ......... . 689 Metropolitan Burglar Alarm Co., Ortmayer, McClain v. .... . . ........ 284 Holmes Electric rotective Co. v. 254 Osceola, The. .... .. ......... — ....... 719 Middaugh v. Bachelder ........ . .. . 706 Osceola, The, and The Belle, Emigh Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Texas & P. v ...... . ...... . .... . ............. 719 . Ry. Co .......... .. . ........ . .... . 359 Ottawa, The ....................... 52 Missouri Pac. R.,Co. v. Texas & P. Ottawa, The, Dunham Towing & Ry. Co., ......................... -360 Wrecking Co. v.. .... . . .1 ........ 52 Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Texas & P. . Ry. Co. . .... . .... . .... . . ...... 861 Paine v. Warren .... . . . . .... . . .... . 357 Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Texas & P. Parker v. New Orleans, B. R. & V. Ry. C0 .... .... . .... .. .... 376 R. Co .... . ....................... 693 Missouri Pac. .Ry. Co. v. Texas & P. Patterson v. Wold .... . . . .... . .... 791 Ry. Co ........................... 701 Pennsylvania R. Co., Kelley v ...... 856 Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Texas do P. Phillips v. United States .... . ...... 164 — Ry. Co .......... .. ..... . ......... . 803 Phillips, Tuttlev ..... . . . . .... . . . . 352 Morris v. Cadwalader .......... . .. . 243 Phoenix Ins. Co., Diebold v .... . . . . 807 4 M0rrisania,.The .... . . ............. 527 Pitkin County Min. Co. v. Markell.. 386 Morrisania, The, Brooklyn & New Pittsburgh, G. & B. Packet Co., York Ferry Co. v ........ . . ...... 527 Hays v .... . ................. . .... 552 Morrow, McConnaughy v .......... 455 Plano Manuf’g Co., Graham v .... . . 917 Morse Arms Manuf’g Co. v. Wim Pope_v. Porter ........ . ............ 7 chester Repeating Arms C0. .... 170 Porter, Pope v. .... . . .......... . . . . 7