Xvi CASES REPORTED. _ , Page PDS' _Missonri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Texas & P. Cmcurr Cotnvr, S. D. OHIO. . Ry.Co.... .... .......... ....376 Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Texas & P. Hutchinson v. Everett ............. 502 By. Co. .... . . .... . . . . ...... . 701 Ml§t§~?`liS.1??I FYI FT .l'.T?l°l .... I sos <>¤=¤¤rT 0<>¤M· S· D- OHIO- W- D- » Newgass v. City of New Orleans. . . 196 Stewart v_ city Of New Orleans_ _ _ _ 196 Al'lI1SU'O11g‘, III 1‘6.. . . .. . . .. . . .. . .... 405 walker v_ Thg City of Ngw Oylgaug 683 Ullltéd SISBBS V. HEIDBI. . . . . . . . . .. . 47]. (jggquyp Ggugryl W_ ])_ LOU];gIANA_ CIRCUIT COURT, W. D. TENNESSEE. Parker v_ New O;·]ggng’ B_ R, & V, Gavin V. VRDOB.. . . .. ... . . .. .. . . .. · 84 R. Co. .. ......................... 693 Cmcmr Coeur, S. D. Mrssrssrprr. SEVENTH GIBCUIT_ F`armers’ Loan & Trust Co. v. Vicks- _ . burg & M. R. C0. . .. . . .. . . .. . . .. . 778 Cnggglqg Cgggrpi N_ D_ ILLINOIS_ 9 C , E_ ])_ T E, Acme Ha Harvestin Co. v. Mar- I mum WBT Em tin .... I ...... . .... 249 Galveston Steam-Ship &:Lighter Co. Brwshtop M8¤¤f’g‘ C0- V- F11`6 ASB I1 v. The R. D. Bitner .............. rss qfP1¤1¤d¤1pbg¤- ·--···· ,- ··-- 234 Rawley v. Southern Pac. R. C0. .... 305 BPIEDIDD M¤¤¤f SCD- V·F1I‘° IDD00- 3, ])_ ibbggy Thg ________ _ ________ 55 of Pennsylvanra ...... , ........ _. . . 236 Wolfe v. Erie Telegraph &; Tele- Bnghton Manuf g Co. »v. Reading phone (jo ____ _ _ ____ _ _ ____ __ __,___ 320 Fire Ins. Co ......... . .... ..... 232 Brighton Manuf’g C0. v. Rehance Ins. C0 ...... . .... . .... . ......... 235 DISTRICT C0UII'I`» E- D- TEXAS City of Chicago v. Illinois Cent. R. 7m Co ....... . . . ................ . . . > . Bt°°kt°u»Ex P¤·I”lF°··-···•··•··•··•-. 95 Graham v. Plano Manuf g C0 ...... 917 Hall v. Greenbaum ......... . . ..... 22 Hotel·Men’s Mut. Ben. Ass’n v. 11 B . .... . . . . ........ . .... . .... SIXTH cmcvwv. K...f.?§Et’;. ..1;....... .... . ......... 293 ‘ . McClain v. Ortmager . .. ....... 2Sé . Potts v. Chicago ity y. o .... . . '1 °‘“°U" C°““"* D‘ KE’"“°“‘ State er Illinois v. Illinois cent. n. 721 *· · · · O..................... .... . .... . Ulgggd mates v' Lomsvlua & N' R" 829 State of Illinois v. Illinois Cent. R. 73 A United States v. Illinois Cent. R. Co 730 _ Cmcmr Comvr, E. D. Mxourem. West v. Bae., ..... . . . . .... . . . . ..... 45 Farmer v. Elstner ............. . .... 494 . Smonsv. Ypsilanti Paper Co ...... 193 DISTRICT COURT- N· D· ILLINOIS' . Dunham Towing'& VVrecking C0. Drsrmcr `Coum, E. D. Mrcnrem. v. The Ottawa ................... 52 _ ‘ Gazelle, The .... . . .... . ........... . 301 Pulaski, The.. . ,i. ........ . . . .. . . .. . 383 Hanson v. The John B. Lyon ...... 184 John B. Lyon, The ....... ..... . . L' llater v. he Gazelle. .... . ..... 1 D‘““"°* °°"‘"* W‘ D M‘°“""“" ollttlwe, The ....................... sz United States v. Davis .... . ........ 865 . ( ‘ ’ Cmcmr Comvr, S. D. I1.1.11