Vlll. CASES REPORTED.
Page - Pace
Brown v. Certain Tons of Coal .... 918 Clay v. Field.. . . .................. 375
Brown v. Finn ...... . .. ........... 124 Cleugh v. The Britannia ...... . . .. 546
Brown, Banque Frauemiigyptienne ·· A , Cochran, Pascault v ...... .. . ...... 358
v. .............. {:.Lt.,..i..·.; .... 162 Collin v.—Day...¤...Z ............... 687
Brown,Bischoffsheim v. ...... . .... 156 Collin v. The Osceola .............. 921
Bullock, Hoifman v ............... . 248 Collins v. Whitehead .......... . . . . 121
Burlington, C. R. do N. Ry. Co.,Chi- Consolidated Electric Light Co. v.
cago, B. & Q. Ry. C0. v. .... .. . .. 481 McKeesport Light Co ............ 335
Buster v. Humphreys .......     507 Continental Const. & Imp. Co., Vi-
7 }   nal v .... .. ..................... 228
Cahn v.Kensler....     .`.».;..·.;   472 Cookv. Cook ....   . .<.. .~. . . .. . .   . 249
Camden Iron—Works v. Fox. .;· ..... 200 Cooper v. The Manhasset and The
Carbonate Bankof Leadvil1le,Brown Portsmouth and Barge 40.. . .. . . , 408
v.   . .. .‘ . .. . . . .......... 4 ........ 776 Cooper, New Jersey .Manuf’g Co. v. 821
Carey. v. Miller ...... . . . . ...... . .‘. 392 Corbin v. Boies .... . ..... . ....... . . 693
` Cargo of.WoodenPosts,A,lZ4evech v. 917 Cordell v. Hall. .... .   . .. .. ....... 866
. Car isle v. The Pomona. .-:..1 .. . .... 919 Cormack v. The Giulio. . .......... 909
·Carpenter..Miller-Magee Co. v.l... . 433 Cornelson. Robertsonv. .. ..... .   .716
Carter, Brooksv. .... .   . .... 505 Cornwall v. The New York .... “ .... 757
Celluldid Manufg Co. v. »A.mericn.n ` Cornwall v. The Norwich ........ ·. . 757
Zylonite Co.... . . .... . .. ... .... ; . .   . 744 Cosulich v. The. Dora. . ... ... . .. .   348
Celluloid Manuf'; Co. v;»Ar11·ngt0n Cosuiich v. The Dora!. —.i .... . . 4 .. . .. . 848
Manufg Co.‘.i; . a. . .. .t L .4..¢.¤L ..   324 Cdtton .v. The., Britannia and The
Central Transp.Co.,‘PullmaniPalace· · Beaconsfield:. ...*..i t';   .¢... .... 546
Car Co. v... .‘. ..·».’.’ ..... ·. 4. .. . . .. . . 357 Cottrell, The John .... . .. . . ....... 907
Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L. ‘ Cousinery v. Schell. . .... . ......... 272
. & P. ·R1y.~O0.. ....... L. . . .. ...... .. 254 Cranmer, The C. Gt . .» ...... . ..... 405
Central rust Co. rv. Wabash, St. L. Crecilius, United. Btatesv. ..... 4 . . . 30
& P. Ry. Co... ..... . . sl.   . `. .‘·. .   . 259 Cummings, Mowry v .... .. . .... . . . . 7-18
Central Trust Oo. v. Wabash, St. L. Custer County, Barnum v .... . . .... 91
& P.   Co. ................ .. .... 616 .» · . V V ¤
Certain: o¤s·of Coal, Brownv. .... 913 Davis, Smith v....   .. .. .. . .... :1 . . 783
C. G. Cranmer, The.... .... . . .....4. . 405 Day, Coiiinv. .».;.     .... . ..... 687
C. G. .Cranmer,‘The, Fells v.·. .. . .. . 405 De Lelle v. The Atalantao. . . .... . . . 918
Chadwick v. Atlas.S. S. Co.. . .... . . 543 Denver R. L. &tC.Co. v. Union Pac. I
Chaffee County, Rollins v.·.;.....~.·. I 91 Ry. Co ...... . .. ..... . .....   . . 386
· Chambers v..Upton... . s.:... L ...... 473 Denver & R. G. R. Co. v. United '.
Champion, The, . . . . .   .... 77 States, two cases.; ........ s .... . .~; 838
Champion,The,.The James H. Brew- z Detroit Lubricator Co., Seibert Cyl·
ste: v.-. .   .. 4.   .... V.   ....... . 77 inder Oil-Cup=Co.v .......... . . . . 216
Chappell v. United States.. . .. ..... 673 Dillon, Hazard v...- . . ...... . ..... .4 ¥485
Charleston, In re.. . . ..·.L’.. . . .. . .... 531 Director, The.-..... .......... . ...... 57
Chelmsford, The- .... . .. . .1... ia .... 399 Director, The, Balfour v. ..... . . . .. 57
Chelmsfor.d,.The, Mayso v.. .... . .... 399 Donaldson, Lydnv .... . . . . .... .   ; 789
Chester, The Cityofu   ..   .... V. . . 429 Dora, The. ...t ..‘.· .... . .......... .. 848
Chicago, B.. 80   Ry. C0;v.‘Burling- Dora, The. .   ........ . . ......... 848
ton, C.. R.~& . Ry. Co. .......... 481 Dora, The, Cosulich .v ........ . .... . .843
Chicago, M. .& St. P. Ry. Co., Dora, The. Cosulich; Vw ..... ‘ .... .. . 848
Knoche v.. .     ..... .4 . . .. .» ..... 471 Dora, The, Ho e I.ns..Co. v. . ....   348
I Chicago, M..& St. P. Ry. Co., Short . {Dora. The, Hoge Ins. C0. v..... .   .». 348
v .... .. . .....   ..... . .... . . .   .. B25 {Dora, The,.Moore v.... ....... ‘ ·. .r. . . 843
Chicago, W. & N. Ry. Co., Laiiinv. 859 Dora, The, Moore v. ......... ‘.; . .   348
Churchill v. Hudson ......... .   14 Dows v. Town of Elmwood .....   114
Citizens’ St. Ry. Co. v. Jones.;-... 579 Dumont, Thenla . A.... ....   ... 428
City of Albany, The .......... ; .... 812 Dunn, Orviss v ..................... 683
City of Chester, The ......... .... . t . 429 . ·
City of Chester, The. Hiltetrantv. 429 Eagon, Boltz·v.~.;»...·. ....... ....... 445
  of Galesburg v. Galesburg  » Eagon, Boltz v. .............. <... .... 452
ater Co..... . ............     .= 675 Eagon. Boltz v.. . ... .. .· ....... nu. . 521
City of Houston, Fazende v .... .·.. . 95 Edison Electric Light Co. v. Weat-
City of Leavenworth, Beall v...... 118 ‘ inghouse... .... .. .......   .. ..;. .;. 282
City of New York, New Yorker N. Edith, The .... · ............... .... . 927
S.·Co. v .........   . ...... . .... :·..· 812 Edwin Hawley, The. ..... . ..... ... .-68
City of 'Ibpeka, Hulbert v .......... ·510 Edwin Hawley, The, Hoboken Land
Clark v. The Belle and The Norwich 669 & Imp. C0. v. .... . ...... . . . . ..... 68