X CASES REPORTED. _ V Page _ _ Page ° , John Cottrell, The, and The Star- . Magoue, Rosenstein v .... ..... 120 light, Laverty v. . ”. .` ...... . ....... 907 Mahon, In re ...... . . . . .... . . . . .... 525 John Trageser ‘ Steam Coppc: Malta; The ......... . ..... . . ........ 144 Works,‘Blessingv .... . . .. .. . .... 753 Malta, The, v. Seven Hundred Tons Johnston; Palmer v ...... . .. . .... 336 of Chalk. .... . ..... . . . . .... . . .... 144 • Jones v. Lamar .... . .. J. ...... .. . . . 454 Manhasset, The ........ . . . ......... 408 Jones, Citizens St. Ry. Co. v .... .. 579 Manhasset, The, and The Ports- Jose E. More, The ...... , . ........ 919 mouth and Barge 40, Cooper v.. . 408 Jose E. More,·The, Kerrv. .... 919 Manhasset, The, and The Ports- ` ’ ‘ ‘ ’ mouth and Barlge 40, Lilliston v. . 408 Kalamazoo Wagon Co. v..Snavely 9521 Manhattan Life ns. Co., Steines v. 441 Kampfe v. Aloe .... . ............ .. . 793 Manning, Bowman do Co., Hal- Kane, `Einaok v .... . ..... , .... , .... . 46 stead v. .... . . .... . . .... . . . . .... . . 565 Keener`vL‘Union Pac. Ry. Co ...... 871 Manning, Platt v. .... . ............. 817 Kensler, Cahn v. ..... . . ...... 472 Manning, Seibert Cylinder Oil-Cup Kerr v. The Jose E. More ...... . . . . 919 Co. v ...... . ......... . ........... 538 Kilig. United States v. .j .... _ ........ 302 Mann’s Boudoir Car‘Co. v, Monarch Knoche v.`Chicago,‘ M. '& St. P. Ry. Parlor Sleeping Car Co ...... . . . . 130 Co. Y .... ` ..... . .... . . ... ...... 471 Marcelia Ann, The. ...... . . .. . .... 142 Kraus v. Fitzpatrick .... ..`;..». . .... 39 Marcelia Ann, The, Blades v ..... , . 142 ‘ ‘ ‘ 5 ‘ Marshall v. Turnbull. ......,... . . . . 827 La Bau, Welling; .... . . .... ; .... . . 40 Martello, The_ ................ . ..... 71 La Compagnie rancaise a Vapour ` Martello, The, Willey v .... . . . . .... 71 v. The Beaconsiield. .1 ........... 546 Martin v. Barbour ....... . . . . ...... 701 Laiiin v. Chicago, W. & N. Ry. Co. 859 Marxv. The Britannia ............. 906 Lake County, Rollins v.‘.‘.‘. . ._ .... . . 845 Maryland Pavement Co., Van Camp Lamar,Jones v .... ........ 454 v. .... .... . .... .3. .... 740 Lavertg vi The John Cottrell and . Mason, United States v ............ 129 , The _ tarlight ...... .. ...... . .... 907 Maxwell v. Atchison, T. &: S. F. R. _ Lawtelle, `The .... . ........ ._ ........ 77 C0 .; ................. . ........... 286 Lawton, Evans v ...... . . . .. . ...., . 233 Maxwell, Farwell v .... . . . . .,.. . . . . 727 Leavittv; `United States.., ..... . . . . 623 Mayo v. The Chelmsford ......... . . 399 . Lee, The Frank P... . .. . ,` .... .. . 480 McConnell, Aultman v. .... .. .... . . 724 Leo, The.': .... . .i .............. . . 140 McKeesport Light Co., Consolidated Leo, The `v.` The Eleanor ........ . . . 140 'Electric Light Co. v ........ . .... . 335 Levech v; A Cargo of Wooden McKinistry‘v. United States .... 211 Posts ................ . .. ... .. . .... 917 Melville, The Thomas ..., . ......... 350 Levison iv. Balfour. .... ...... . . . . 382 Merchants' Nat. Bank of Chicago v. Levy v. The Thomas Melville,. .... 350 Sabin .. .... . .................. . . . 492 Lidgerwood Manuf' g C0., Mundy v. 541 Michaelis v. Roessler .... . ......... 325 Ligowski Clay-Pigeon C0. v. Amer- Michigan Lubricatorg Co., Seibert ican Clay—Bi1·d Co .... . ........ . . . 828 Cylinder Oil-Cup Co. v ..... . ..... 33 Lilliston v; The Manhassetand The Millard v. The New Orleans ....... 663 Portsmouth and Barge 40 ........ 408 Miller. Carey v. . . ............ . . . . 392 Lippincott v. Shaw Carriage Co .... _ 570 Miller-Magee Co. v. Carpenter L .... 433 Liverpool & London & G obe Ins. Mississippi &: Yazoo acket Co., Co., Gunther v ................... 501 Whipple v ........ . . .‘ .... . , ...... 54 . Lizzie Wilson, The .... ..... ., .... 543 Missouri, K. do T. Ry. Co., Barry Lone Star, The .... . ........,...... 807 v .... . ....................... . . .. . 829 Longdale Iron Co. v. Pomeroy Iron Missouri Pac. Ry. Co. v. Texas & P. Co ............................... 448 Ry. Co .................. .... 92 LordO'Nelll, The .... . ,............ 425 Monarch Parlor Sleeping Car Co., Lord O’Neil1, The,_The Helena v. . 425 Mann’s Boudoir Car Co. ‘v ........ 130 Louisiana, The .... L .‘ ....... . ...... 663 Moorev. Baker. . .... .... .. 1 _ Louisiana, The, National Storage Moore v. The Dora. ............ . . . . 343 Co. v ..... ‘ .... . ................. 663 Moore v. The Dora . ..... . ......... 348 Louisiana, The, New York Harbor More, The Jose E,. , ..........,.... 919 Tow·Boat‘Co. v ........... . .... . . 663 Morss v. Uiford .......... .. .. ...... 37 Louisiana, The, Van Wie v ....... ·. 663 Morton v. The Rothemay .......... . 80 Louisville, N. O. do T. R. Co., Roy v. 276 Mowry v. Cummings,. . . . .... . . .... 713 Loving,} United States v .... . ...... 715 Mundy v. Lidgerwood Manuf’g Co., 541 Lown es v. The Phoenix. . . . ....... 760 Municipal, The .... . .... . . .... . . . . 812 Lyon v.·Donaldson .... .... 789 Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass’n, , s · · V Adreveuov; ............... ,.....870 Mackintosh v. Flint & P. M. R. Co. 582 Myers Sanitary Depot, Huber v .... 752