CASES REPORTED. xm
’ Page Page
Wabash, St. L. &P. Ry. C0., Beers v. 244 Whitehead. Collins v. .... . ......... 121
Wabash, St. L. &P. Ry. Co., Central Wilce, Tiffany v.. . , .... . .......... 230
Trust Co. v ........ . .... . .... . . . . 254 Willets Manuf’g Co., Tomkinson v. 536
Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. C0., Central Willey, The Freda A ............... 71
Trust C0. v ....... . .... . ........ 259 Willey v. The Martello .... . . . . .... 71
Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co., Cen- Williams v. United States ...... . . . . 25
tral Trust C0. v. .... . . .... . ...... 616 Wilson v. The Freda A. Willey.... 71
Wasp, The .... . . .... . ............. 222 Wilson, The Lizzie .... . . ........ .. 543
Wasp, The, Hudson v ....... _ ....... 222 ` Wilson v. The Vidette .... . ...... . 396
Weaver, Hall v.. .... . ........ . ..... 104 Wilson v. Western Union Tel. Co. 561
Weaver, Hecht v ................ . . . 111 Windmuller v. The Thomas Melville 350
Wellingjv. La Bau .......... . . .... . 40 Witters v. Sowles ....... . .. ....... 119
Wenz, nited States v... .· .......... 154 Wolcott v. Aspen M. & S. Co. .... . . 821
Western Union Tel. Co., Wilson v. 561 Wolcott v. Studebaker. .... . . . . .. . 8
Westinghouse, E di s o n Electric Wren v. Anniu .... . ................ 435
Light Co. v ................. . . .. 232
Wheeler v. Sexton .... » ............ . 154 Young v. Wheeler ............. . . . . 98
Wheeler, Young v. .... . . .... . . .... 98
Whipple v. Mississippi & Yazoo Zaccaro v. The Brothers Apep ..... 352
Pac et Co. .... . ..... . ..... ..   54 Zeringue v. Texas & P. B. C0 .... .. 239