XV} CASES REPORTED. Page Page ‘ Celluloid Manuf’g Co. v. American John Cottrell, The ................. 907 Zylonite Co. ........ . . .. . . .. . , .. . 744 La Compagnie Francaise a. Vapeur Cousinery v. Schell .... . . .......... 272 v. The Beaconsiield .............. 546 Cook v. Cook .... . . .... . . .......... 249 Lavertg v. The John Cottrell and ' Falk v. Howell .... . .............. . 739 The tarhfght ........ . .... ..,.. . 907 \ Halstead v. Manning,Bowman &C0. 565 Leavitt v. nited States. ....... . . . . 623 Hazard v. Dillon ................. . . 485 Louisiana, The .... . ............... 663 Heyman v. Uhl1:nan.. .. .. ..... . .... 686 Martel1o,The. ............... . ..... 7l Hoffman v. Bullock ....... .. . .... . . 248 Marx v. The Britannia ............. 906 Huber v. Myers Sanitary Depot .... 752 Millard v. The New Orleans ....... 663 Kampfe v. Aloe .... . . .... . . .... . . . . 793 Morton v. The ltothernay .... . ..... S0 Kraus v. Fitzpatrick. .· ......... . .. . 39 Municipal. The .... . .............. 812 . Levy v. The Thomas Melville... . . . 350 National Storage Co. v. The Louis- Mann’s Boudoir Car Co. v. Monarch iana ...... . ....... . .............. 663 V Parlor Sleeping Car Co. . .... . . . . 130 New Orleans, The ................. 663 Mundy v. Lidgerwood Manuf’g Co.. 541 New York, The .... . ....... . ....... 757 Platt v. Manning ...... . . . . .... . . . . 817 New York Harbor Tow-Boat Co. v. Robostelli vv. New York, N. H. & H. The Louisiana .... . .............. 663 R. Co .... . . . . .... . ....... . ....... 507 New York & C. S. S. Co. v. The Robostelli v. New York, N. H. do H. Baltimore ...... . ................ 660 R. Co ................ ...... 719 New York` & N. S. Co. v. City of Rogers v. Riessner ........... . . .. . 270 New York .... . ..... . ......... . .. 812 Rogers L. & M. Works v. Southern Norwich. The ...... . . . ............ 669 Railroad Ass’n ........... . . . . .... 278 Norwich, The ...................... 757 Rosenstein v. Magone .... . . . .. .... . 120 Paolillo v. One Thousand Nine Hun- Schnelle & Querl Lumber Co. v. Bar- dred and Forty Bales of Vegetable low. ........... . ..... . ..... . .... 853 Hair ............ . .... . . . . .... . . . . 909 Seibert Cylinder .Oil·Cup Co. v. Principia. The... . . ................ 667 Manning. .... . . . . .... . . . .. . . .. .. 538 Rothemay, The.. . .... . . .......... 80 Ten Cases v. United States .... . .... 100 Rumball v. Puls .... . . . . ...... . . . .. 665 ‘ Thomas Melville. The .... . ......... 350 St. Johns, The ...... . .............. 763 Thompson v. Gildersleeve ......... 43 Seacaucus, The ................... 68 Tomkinson v. Willets Manuf’g Co,. 536 Sea Witch, The .... . . ...... . . . .... . 654 Welling v. La. Bau .... . . ...... . .... 40 Starlight, The.. .... . .... . ...... . . . . 907 Windmuller v. TheThomas Melville 350 Stillwell v. The J. D. Hall .......... 904 Tebovy. TheTS1eaLWitch ...... . ..... . I _ _ _ an ie v. e ouisxana ...... . .. D STRICT COURT' S D NEW YORK Van Wie v. The Seacaucus ......... 68 Alexandre v. The Principia. ........ 667 Willey v. The Martello ........ . . . . 71 Baltimore, The.. . . ...... . ......... 660 Wilson v. The Freda A. Willey .... 71 Beaconsiield, The .................. 546 . Eiilitlalrteii I I If II I I ZZZI I I if I II gig ¤¤=¤¤¤ ¤<>¤M· D· VEMNT- Cit of Albany, The ....... . . . . .... 812 . Cit; of Chester, ThG·_ _ _ __ _ _ _· n_ _ _ 429 WIEYOISV. Sowles . u... .. .. u..... 119 Clark v. The Belle and The Norwich 669 gleugh g. Tl¥hBrgannia .... . ...... 346 ormac v. e iulio ........ . . . . 9 Cornwall v. The New York ........ 757 THIRD CIRCUIT- Cornwall v. The orwich .... . . .... 757 °°£§t0§‘.€§§. §T‘??f"T1.*E ;‘f’?f¥.?Z’T? 546 Clem Com D- DmW·¤=¤· De e le v. The talanta. . . .... , . . . 918 Edwin Hawley, Tho' _ I lo H l i U . · I. 68 Pascault v. Cochran.. .... . . . . ...... 358 Frammas Warsaktiebolag. The, v. The Jas. A. Dumont .......... .. . 428 Crncmr Cormr, D. New J mnsmv. Freda A. Willey, The .... . ......... 71 Gen. Rosecrans, The ............... 763 Camden Iron-Works v. Fox .... . . . . 200 Giulio, The .... . . .... . . . . .... . . . .. . 909 Celluloid Manuf’g Co. v. Arlington Heath v. The St. Johns and The Gen. Manuf’g Co ................ . .... . 824 Rosecrans. ....... . .... . . .· .... 763 Edison Electric Light Co. v. West· Hiltetrant v. The City of Chester. . 429 inghouse .... . .. .... . ............. 282 Hoboken Land & Imp Co. v. The Hat Sweat Manuf’g Co. v. Porter.. . 745 Edwin Hawley ................... 68 Michaelis v. Roessler .... . .... , . .. . 325 Jas. A. Dumont, The. ..... . . . .... 428 New Jersey Manuf’g Co. v. Cooper.. 321