xviii` cases nnromao.
_ . Page Page
Smythe v. New Orleans Canal & Seibert C linder Oil-Cup Co. v.
Banking Co .................. . . . . 825 Detroit Igubricator Co. . . .... . . . . 216 ,
Zeringue v. Texas & P. R. Co. .... . 239 Seébert Cylinder Oil-Cup Co. v. 83
race ........ . ................... i
Drsrnicui CoUn·r, E. D. Lomsrmu. S°]{£‘°£igS§ 1E“uC{)°;c3L1;%%p C0' v‘ 23
Cosulich v. The Dora .... . .... . .... 343
Dora, The .... . .................... $45 Dxsarnror Coom. E. D. Mromesxv.
Hope Ins. Co. v. The Dore ......... :+43 -
Moore v. The Dora. .... . .......... . 343 United States v. Atkinson ...... . . . 316
DISTBICTCOURT, N. D. M1ss1ss11=r1.W.D. *Dxs·1·mc*r Coum, W. D. Miomonn, N. D.
gank 0} Winona v. Avery .... . .... 381 Brown v. Certain Tons of Coal .... 913
ay v. ield. ............ . ....... . . 5
Cmourr Comvr, W. D. Mmmesiv, S. D.
CIRCUIT Comm-, S. D. M1ssrssu=r•r,W. D. .
‘ Chambers v. Upton,. .... . ......... 473
Everhart v. Everhart .... . ......... . 82 Tiifany v. Wilce ................... 230
Frankenthal v. Gilbert ............. 5
Henry v. Bond. ....,..... . .. ..... 101 CIRCUIT COURT, S. D- Omo-
Drsrmcm Comvr, S. D. MTSSISSIPPI,W. D. Ligowgi Cigy-lliggeon Co. v. Amer- 328
Wgipgle   V. Mississippi & YM00 54 1can ay- 1r o ............ . .. .
t C ....................... . ‘
ac 6 0 Cmcnxr Cover, S. D. Omo, W. D.
CIRCUIT C°URT· E' D· TEXAS' Ltingdale Iron Co. v. Pomeroy Iron 448
o. .... . .. .... . .................. ·
Fazende v. City of Houston .... . . . . 95 giillergiageg G0_ g gmépclgmrd ____ 433
outh ovington . . y. 0. v.
Cmeurr Comm-, N. D. Tnxss. Gest ................   .... . . . . 628
United States Bung Manuf’g Co. v.
Orviss v. Dunn .... .. .... .. ........ 683 Armstrong .......... . ...... . ..... 94
DISTRICT COURT- N· D- TEXAS- Cmcnrr Comvr, W. D. Tnnnnssnn.
Taylor v. Robinson .... . . .. ........ 678 R _ L ‘ "u , N, 0, &T, R, 0 . 276
· United States v. Hughes. ........ . .. 732 Oy v mmm 6 0
United States v. Loving .... . ....... 715
SEVENTH 3 CIRCUIT.
e SIXTH CIRCUIT. .
. . Cmcorm Comm N. D. ILLINOIS.
. CIRCUIT COURT- D- KENTUCKY- geers vé Wabash, St. L. Gag. I%yi)C0. 244
' G l sb .
A1b¤r¤ v- 0r¤¤r <>f ¤1w¤¤¤ Fri¤¤<1¤ 721 lWat(er oe?.?..?? $1]... 3 I i . Ii? eva
‘ gorginlv. Iiibies .... . ...............  
ore v. a. .... .. ....   ....
DISTRICT Comm" D' KENTUCKY' Eowskv. Town of Elmwood ....    
mac V. aI1B.' ....... . ........... J
Mahon,_In re. .. ...... . .... . ....... 525 Gcgmulg & Jfemgy Mmmfg O0. vn 818
ope anufg o ....   ....  
Cmcnrr Comvr, E. D. Mxcmoszv. J.SB._ Brewster & Co. v. Tuthill 769
prmg 0 ............ . ...... .. . . .
' Mackintosh v. Flint & P. M. R. Co. 582 Pope Manufg Co. v. Gormully ..... 877
Maxwell v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Pope Manuf’g Co. v. Gormully &
Co ................ . . . ............ 286 J effrey Manuf’g Co .............. 885
Parker v. Flint & P. M. R. Co ...... 582 Pope 1 anuf’g Co. v. Gormully &
Pearce v. Humphreys. . .... . . . . .... 282 Jeffrey Manuf’g Ca .... . . . . ...... 893