casns REPORTED. xix
Page Page
Polpe Manuf’g Co. v.· Gormully & Henry v. Travelers' Ins. Co ........ 258
etfrey Manuf’g Oo. ............. 896 Keener v. Union Pac. Ry. Co ...... 871
Wolcott v. Studebaker. .... . ....... 8 gowns v. IChlatfe}e County .... . ..... Sig
o_insv. a e ounty .... . ....  
Drsrmc-r Comvr, N. D. Innmors. €V’gf§gt?;”Xz;é;V];“?§·S· -66 ···· ·· -  
Collin v. Day .... .. ................ 687 Ymmg '· Whcelcr ·······•·· J - · ···· 98
Cmcurr Comvr, N. D. Innmors, S. D. CIRCUIT Comm N- D- IOWA W- D-
Lyon v. Donaldson .... . .......... 789 S1g;1§gty& St' P' R' C0' v` Ummd 835
O’Brien Bros. Manuf’g Co. v. Peoria   ` ` °' " ’ ' ' ''''°‘'' ' ''''''
Plow Co. .... . . . . ................ 786
o-Brien Bms.1w1a¤¤r·g oo. v. Pierce vac Cmvvrr Cover. S. D. Iowa.
Smith v. Davis. .................... 783 Chicago. B. & Q. Ry. CO. V. Bw1mg_
ton, C. R. & N. Ry. Co. ....   481
Gmcvvr Germ-r. S- D· Imrors- Farwell v. Maxweii .... . ...... . .... 727
;°£°i>“?l1¥;5Z? T X'. Y’i`T€`$`1}i .$Y‘.i“Z 616 ¤=¤¤¤¤ ¤<>¤¤=T·S-»D-1¤wA»W·D-
owry v. ummings.. ....... . ..... 13
St. Louis & C. R. C0. vn Thomas"-. 774 Aultman v. McConnell. ..... . . .... 724
Cmourr Comm-, D. INDIANA. CIRCUIT COURT D' KANSAS' l
gmt T nah. .B. ..£   .   .... 666 §?,"}{}..¥; €}‘é’.€§ .{‘F$‘¤2§,“.'lZ§T“F;1IItZ ii?
6E2X...;.;???. X? ...... f’f’.. .‘f‘.Z’; at K-lame-00 W-6<·¤ 00- V- S-·-·*--=ly 82*
' ' . h ‘ · '. .... 5
5£T£S$§°$ E36? €”}I.Y1??°? E? .... sgg DISTRICT ¤<>¤¤<T· D- KMA6-
United States v. Harmon ........ . . . 872
Cmcurr Couwr. E. D. W1scoNs1N.
Lenin v. chicago, w. & N. Ry. 00. ssa C“‘°“"’ C°““`· D- Mum-“°'”·
MODIS V. BRIKGI`. . . . . .· • · N . . .. . • .• • 1 Binaud v_ Wrirthwcstern Fuel   _  
G enmont, e .... . . .............. . 4 2
Hansen v. The Glenmont. ........ . 402
EIGHTH OIRCU-[T_ Mg1;c{hants’ Nat. Bank of Chicago v. 492
Short v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry.
Cmcurr Comvr, E. D. Amunsns. T Coi_. . .... &.   .. M .... T,. .   . 225
om mson e s er an o.
Aneirioau B¤11T¤1. Co. v. Southern 795 v. sham .... . ............   E .... 380
e . o .... . .....................
Age;-icagi Bell Tel. C0. v. Southern 803 DISTRICT COURT, D_ MINNESOTA_
CWZ911¤’ Sh RYTC6; UV- J0118;         579 Charleston, In re ................... 531
Martin V. B&I‘b0\1I' .. . . .. .. . . .. . . .. . 701 Oleggu v, The Ida Campbell, ,_,,__ , 432 ,
Cmcurr Comvr, D. Conoasno. CIRCUIT Comm-, E. D. Mxssomar, E. D.
Babcock v. United States. ....     873 Adreveno v. Mutual Reserve Fund
Barnum v. Custer County . .... . . . . 91 Life Ass’n .... . . .... . . .... . . ..... 870
Brown v. Carbonate Bank of Lead- Bliss v. United States .... . . . . ...... 781
ville .... . ........................ 776 Boltz v. Eagon. ...... . . . . ...... . .. . 445
Brown v. Finn ................. . . . . 124 Boltz v. Eagon .......... . . . .... . . . . 452
Collins v. Whitehead .............. 121 Boltz v. Eagon. .................... 521
Denver3R. L. do C. Co. v. Union Pac. 8 Ce£t113aléI`rugt C0. v. Wabash, St. L. 254 .
y. o ........ . .....   .... ....36 . y. 0. ........ . ..... . .....
Denver & R. G. R. Co. v. United Central Trust Co. v. Wabash, St. L.
States, two cases ................. 838 & P. Ry. Co.. .... . ...... . .... . . . . 259
Gottlieb v. Thatcher ...... . . . . ..... 435 Churchill v. Hudson ..... . ..... . . . 14
Haag v. Board of County Com’rs.. . 778 Fotheringhamv. Adams Express Co. 646