Vlll. CASES REPORTED. Page Page · Boston Hammock Spreader Co., Chicago, St. P., M. & O. Ry. Co. v. Travers v ............ . ........... 133 Becker .... . . .... 1 . . . .... . . . .... 883 Bowers, Creamer v. ....... ...° ..... 206 Chicago, St. P. & K. C. Ry. Co., Boylston Ins. Co., Swayne v .... . .. 1 Lewis v ........ . . .... . . .......... 639 Bradley, Eagle Manuf’gCo. v ...... 295 Chicago, St. P. & K. C. Ry. Co., — Bradley & ubbard Manuf"g C0. v. Swanson v ............. . ......... 638 Charles Parker C0 ............... 748 Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. Dey. .. 866 Bradshaw, Chappell v ...... . .... .. 923 Chin King, Ex arte .... .. .... . .... 354 Braga. v. The Solis .... . ....... . .... 545 C. Huffmaster, United States v ..... 81 Brahn v. Ramapo Iron-Works .... . 63 C. Huifmaster, United States v ..... 83 Breedv. Northern Pac. R. C0 .... ; . 642 Citizens' Electric Light Co., Thom- Bridgeport, The, Potts v.,two cases, 222 son-Houston Electric C0. v .... . . 904 Bridgeport, The, Potts v. .... . . .... 224 Citizens’ Nat. Bank v. Dowd ....... 340 Bridgeport, The, Union Ins. Co. v. . 222 City of Brenham, German·American Bridgeport, The, Union Ins. C0. v. . 224 Bank v. . . .. .. .. . ................. 185 Bridgeport, The, Van Dyke v .... . . 159 City of Kahoka.; Hill v ....... . . . .. . 32 Bronson v. St. Croix Lumber Co. . . 634 City of Lakeview, Peeney v .... . . . 586 Brooklyn Watch-Case Co. v. Leach 2 City of New York, Campbell v ..... 14 Brooklyn dc. N. Y. Ferry Co. v. The City of New York, Campbell v ..... 504 Morrisania .... . ........ . . . . .... 558 City of New York, The ......... ‘ .. . 604 Brown v. Toledo, P. & W. R. Co. . . 444 City of New York, The, Macham v. 604 Brown, Farwell v ....... . .... 811 City of Truro, The ................. 317 Brown, Holland v .... . .. . . ........ 43 City of Truro, The, Balmer v .... . . . 317 Brown, Pugsley v .... . . . . .... . .... 688 Claflin v. Beaver .............. J .... 259 Buifalo Grape Sugar Co., New York Clapox, United States v ...... . .... 575 V Grape Simar Co. v ............... 212 Clarke v. American Dock dc Im- Bunker v. he W. J'. McCaldin .... 330 provexnent Co ...... . .... . .... . . . . 478 Burrell v. Hackley .... . . . ..... . .. . 838 Clark, McCarthy v. .... . ........... 360 Burrell v. Pratt. ..... . ......... . . . . 834 Cleveland Stone Co., A. F. Pike ‘ Butterdeld, Casey v. .... . ......... . 77 Manut’g Co. v. ................... 896 Clinton, The. Carpenter v. . .... . . . . 672 Calloway, August v .... . .... .. ..... 381 Comn v. The Osceola .... . ......... 559 Cammeyer v. Durham House Drain- Cofrode, Sellers v .... . . .... . . . . .... 131 · age Co. .... . .... .... .. . .... . . . 51 Colby. Tobey Furniture C0. v ...... 592 Campbell v. City of New York ..... 14 Colgan v. Danheiser. .... . .......... 150 Campbell v. City of New York ..... ’ 504 Colorado United Min. Co., Canter Canter v. Colorado United Min. Co. 41 v .... . . . . .... . . . . ........ . ....... 41 Card v. Hines ...... . . ....... .. . .... 598 Comanche County, Lewis v ........ 843 Cargo and Materials of The Slobod- Compagnie Générale Transatlan· · na, Baker v .... . . ...... . . . ...... 537 tique v. Hoguet ......... . ....... 835 Carlisle v. The Pomona ..... .. . . .. . 921 Comstock. Schroeder v.. . . ......... 652 Carpenter v. The Clinton .... . . 672 Consolidated Bunggng App. Co. v. Case v. The Susquehanna .... .. .... 325 P. Schoenhofen rewing Co ..... 73 Casey v. Butterfield .... ....... .... . 77 Continental Const. & Imp. Co., Catchpole v. Pulsifer .... .. .. .. . 766 Vina] v .............. . .... . 673 Cawthorn, Hughes v ..... . . .... .. . 248 Cooley v. McArthur ................ 372 ‘ Celluloid Manuf’g Co. v. American County Court v. Baltimore & O. R. Zylonite Co .......... . ........... 801 Co .... . .... . . . . .... . . .... . . . .... . 161 Celluloid Manufg Co. v. American Cowan v. Union Pac. Ry. Co .... .. . 43 Zylonite Co .... . . . . .... . . .... . . . . 417 Crandall v. The Bitterne. . . . . ...... 927 Celluloid Manuf’g Co. v. Russell. . . 17 Creamer v. Bowers ................. 206 Certain Bales of Cotton, Ross v .... 796 Cronkhite v. Accident Ins. Co. of Chamglin v. The Helena E. Russell 220 North America ..... . ........ . .... 26 Chan an Hee, Ex parte .... . ..... .. 354 Cuthbert v. Galloway ...... . . . .... . 466 Chappell v. Bradshaw .... . . ....... 923 V Charles Parker Co., Bradley & Hub- Dacotah, The ................ . .... 548 bard Manuf’g Co. v .... . ......... 748 Dacotah, The, Boschert v .... . ..... 548 Chateaugay Ore & Iron Co. v. Blake 804 Danheiser, Colgan v. .... .. . . ...... 150 Chesebrougih, Arnold v .... . ...... .. 16 Daniel Kaine, The. ................. 785 Chesebro, ashington Fire & Ma- Daniel Kaine, The, James Dalzell’s rine Ins. Co. v .............. . .... 477 Son &C0. v ...... . . ........... 785 Chicago Fire·Proof Co., Wight Fire- De la Vergne Refrigerating Ma- Prooiingt Co. v ...... . . . .... . . . .. 582 chine Co., Dickerson v ........... 143 Chicago, . & St. P. Ry. Co., Fran- Denicke, United States v .... . ...... 407 cisco v .... . . .... . . . . .... . .. ...... 647 Devine v. The Tiverton .... . . . . .... 529