X CASES REPORTED; . _ Page .. Page A Hinz, United tates v. ............. 272 Kitsell, American Bell Tel. Co. v... 521 Hoboken Land & Imp. C0. v. The 113 gem v.1`I;1eetford . . . . .... . . .. .... 293 · Baltimore . ...... . ........ . . . naDP» orss v .................... Hoboken Land & Imp. Co. v. The Kreling, Goldmark v .......... . . . . 661 Hliétltimore . ......... ..... _.]. . .f 614 Kretzmer v. The William A. Lever- 783 0 man v. upreme ouncr 0 . ing . .. .............. . ............. Ameijicanltegion of Honor ..... ·. 252 Hoag v. The ennsylvania Annex 560 La Eau, Welling v. ...... . .......... · 0. .,.,.. ...... ....... ~ a au, e1lingv.. ...... . ...... ,.. Hognet, Compagnie Générale Trans- Lack awann a, The ............ . .. . . . 613 atlantique v' . .. . . . ...... . . t .. . . 835 Lackawanna, The .................. 614 Holland v. Brcxvn . . . . . .... . . ... 743 Laézkawanna, The, Pennsylvania R. 613 . ome Benefit ss’n, ar ent v .... . . 1 o. v. ............................ gooper 1;.,The Mary N. Hogan .... . Laézkawanne, The, Pennsylvania R. 614 orne, oyt v._ . . .... . . . . .... . .... 0.. v. ..... . .... . ................. Horsford v. Gudgexx. ........ . ..... 388 La Compagnie Francaise de Navi- gowardlvl. St. Paul Plow-Works. . . §ation a Vapeur Cyp. Fabre & Cie, 531 oyt v. orne .... . ., ...... .. ..... onanno v ...........,.... . . . .... Hubel v. Dick... . . .... . . . . ..... ·. . . . .414 La Compagnie Générale Transatlan- Hubel v. Waldie. .. ............. 414 tique, Euberweg v ............... 428 Hudson v. Bishop, ............ .. ,..~. 820 La Compagnie Générale Transatlan- Hngdsokn River est Shore Ry. Co., 3 tique, Eubeéwcg v ..... . ......... 530 ee man v. , . . .... . ..... .' ....... . `Amerique, he ......... . .... .. . . 835 Huey v. Macon County. .... . . . .·. .. . 481 Lane & Bodley Co.`, Locke v. ....... 289 Hug es v. Cawthorn .... . .... ...;.. 248 Lawrenceville Cement Co. v. The » Huntv. Patchiu .... . . .... . .... .4 . . 816 Susquehanna ........ . . . . ........ 320 Hurd v. Snow. . _. . .............. . . . . 423 Iljeach, Brooklygi Watch-Case C0. v. 2 V V ». ehigh Coal av. Co. v. The » India·Rubber Comb C0., Rubber Sa Amos D.·Carver .................. ‘ 665 _ Cellulo1d_H. T. Co. v., two cases,. 498 Leibrandt & McDowell Stove Co. v. ‘ · Isgai, Txllyer, The, v. The T. J. 551 I;Fire511anrishIns. Co. of Baltimore., 30 _ c uy er. . ., .... , ................ coca ia, e.. .... .. .... . ....... .. 534 . Ives v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co...~.. 176 Leocadia, The, Wilson v. ......... ~. . 534 Ives, McKeen v. ; .— ............. . .. . 801 Leverich, McAdams v .......... . . . .· 305 ..· ¤. . Le' .Ch' ,St.P.&K.C;R.. , Jackson County, May v ..._ . . .. .. t 710 . . ... .... . ....... 639 Jacobus v. Monongahela Nat. Bank Lewis v. Comanche County. . . . . 343 of Brownsv11le., ............... . . 395 L. Huifmaster, United States v ..... 83 gaehnegn rei ; . . . ..... 357 Li§ owskyCClay-Pigeon Co. v. Peoria ` ames_ a ze; ’s on 0., v. e arget o ......... . .............. 755 Daniel Kaine ........ . . .......... 785 Ligowsky Clay-Pigeon Co. v. Peoria _ J. H.,Rutter, The, Haddon v., two L a(rgetCJo... . . .... . .... cases......... ...... . ..... . ..... t ocev. ane o e 0 ........ Johannesen, United States v., two 411 Lone Star, 'Il;l1e6 .......... 793 ~.cases ............ .. ........ 0u'sv' e, . . . . C ., H - John Ritson. The, Wilson v. .. . 663 ris v.1 ........ . .. .. .... . . . .. 116 . Johnson v. Accident Ins. C0. of Low v. Fels.Z ................ . . .... 361 North America ...... ...,.... . 374 Lyonv. Union Pac. Ry. Co. ....... ~. 111 Johnson v. The Portuense. .... .. . . . 670 , genes v. Macon County .... . . . .... ,. Macham win The City of New York.. 604 ones v. ar m..., .... . ...... . .... , .... . ...... .... 86 Jones v. Moll .... ., ._ .... . .. . . .. . .... 348 Mggkgy, Hggkzman v ........ . ...... 353 Jones v. United State .. ........ . . 561 Mn.cMaster v. The Sammy ...... . . i . 327 Jones & Laughlin, Reiter v .... . . . . 421 Macon County, Huey v ..... . ...... 481 Jose E._ More, The, Kerr v.. .... _ .... 921 Macon County, Jones v ...... . . . .. . 481 K I 288 Macon Cotantygourtélgiited States v. 483 as, nre...., ........... ........ aonev. ic mon D.R.C ...625 §ehk>r Mlgling C0., Adams v.. . . .. . Malolne, Satteriield v ........... (3. . . 445 01 _v. e am. .... . ........ ...... t . h .. .... . .... .......206 Kerr v. The José_ E. More . . .... . . 921 Mgntghtrv. Theagngela Maria. .— .... 430 Keystone Manufg Co., Adams v. . . 579 Martha, The ....... — .... . ........... 313 Eidgv. greenwrch Ins. Co. .... . . . . Martha,JThe, Straus v ............. . 313 v. ans0m.. .... . ..... . ....... t' , ...... . ............. 348 Kinnebrew, Ex parte. .... . . .... . . . . 52 M:;y:1ZN. Hlzgah, The ............... 554 ` K1ssam, Anderson v ................ 699 Mary N. Hogan, The, Hooper v .... 554