xii easns asroarmo. ‘ Page Page Regester, Hancock `[nspirator Co. v. 61 Snow, Hurd v .... . ................ 423 Reiter v; Jones .& Laughlin. . . .. . . . 421 Solis, The ... . .......... . . . Q. . ..... 545 Romer v. Mackay .... .............. 86 Solis, The, Braga v .... . ....... 545 Reynolds, Ellis v . . . .... . .... ._.. .... 394 Soutter, Duchesse d`Auxy v. .... . .. 809 Richmond & D. R.‘Co., Malone v .. 625 Sowles ‘v. Witters. .... . . ; . .... . .... 463 Robb v. Perrv; . . .... ‘. ...... . . . .. 102 Sowles, Witters v.`.. . .... . . . . .... .. 640 Robinson v. Fifteen Thousand Five Spalding, Hammerschlag Manuf’g Hundred and Sixteen Bags of , Co. v .... ’ ........................ 66 Sugar ..... . .... . . . . ........... 603 Spalding, Hammerschlag Manu? g Robinson, Syracuse Chilled Plow Co. v .....’ . .... . ................. 6 7 Co. v .......... . ................ _. 502 Stanger, In re ...................... 238 Ross v. Certain Bales of Cotton .... 796 Star Sand Co., Williams v .... . . .... 369 Ross v. The Angeline Anderson .... 796 Stein, Foote v ............. . . . . .... 205 Roth, Beard v.. .... . .. ‘. . ...... . . . . 397 Stephens, Furber v .... . ........... 17 Rubber & Celluloid H. T. Co. v. In- Strange v; Barney .... . .... . . . ...... 196 dia·Rubber Comb Co., two cases,. 498 Straus v. The Martha. . ...... . ..... 313 Rumford Chemical Works v. Mutha 524 Streat v. White .... . ....... . ...... . 426 Rushton v. Thompson. .......... .. . 635 Sun Electric Co., Westinghouse Russell, Celluloid Manuf’g Co. v... . 17 Electric Co. v.. ......... . ,... . .... 899 Rutz v. Seeger ............ .. .... . 188 Supreme Council of American Le- · Ryan v. Hard. . . . .... . ......... . .. . 831 gion of Honor, Hoffman v ....... 252 Susquehanna, The .... . ........ . . . . 320 St. Croix Lumber Co., Bronson v. . . 684 Susquehanna, The, Case v.. .. ...... 325 St. Paul Plow-Works, Howard v. . . 743 Susquehanna, The, Lawrenceville Sammy, The ......... . ....... . .. .. . 327 Cement Co. v .................... 320 Sammy, The, MacMaster v .... . .... 327 Swan v. Five Hundred and Fifty Sargent v. Home Benefit Ass’n ..... 711 ` Tons Reserve Coal .... . .......... 307 Satterneld v. Malone. .... . .. ... .... 445 Swanson v. Chicago, St. P. & K. C. Schneider, United States v. . . . .. .. . 107 ~ Ry. Co. .... . ......... . . . . ........ 638 Schroeder v. Comstock . . ........ 652 Swartchild. Freese v ........ . ...... 141 Schroeder v. Mills. ...... . .......... 652 Swayne v. Boylston Ins. Co ........ 1 . Schroeder v. Trubee, four cases .... 652 Sylvan Stream, The .......... . ..... 314 Schroeder v. Willett. ..... . .... ‘ .... 652 Syracuse Chilled Plow C0. v. Rob- Schumacher v."Wogram. ......... .. 210 inson ........ . ................... 502 Scotia, The .............. .. .... .. . . 907 Syracuse, The, Orison v. .......... . 367 Scotia, The, Florez v .... . ......... 916 Scotia, The, Mills v ............. .. . 907 Taylor, United States v .... . . . . .... 484 i Scotia, The, Tweedy v ..... . ....... 907 T. G. Conway Co., Baldwin v. . .... 519 Secor v. Singleton ................. 376 Theband, Ardan S. S. Co. v .... .. . . 620 Seeger, Rutz v.. . .. . . .. . ........ . . . 188 Thomas v. Williams .... . ........... 71 Seiberling, Smith v ...... . ...... .. 677 Thomas, In re .... . . ...... . ........ 337 Seibert Cylinder Oil Co. v. William Thomas, In re ........... . .... . . .... 822 Powell Co ....................... 591 Thompson v. American Bank Note Seibert Cylinder Oil-Cup Co. v. Co._ ............. .... . ..... . . 203 Newark Lubricator Manuf’g Co. . 509 Thompson, Rushton v.. ............ 635 Sellers v. Cofrode. ....... .. 131 Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Seventh Nat. Bank of Philadelphia Citizens’ Electric Light Co ....... 904 v. Shenandoah Iron Co. . ........ 436 Tiverton, The,‘Devine v. .... . .... . . 529 Shaver Wagon Co., Tuthill Spring T. J: Schuyler, The, The Isaac H. Co. v .......... . . ................ 644 Tillyer v. ........ . ............... 551 Shenandoah Iron Co., Seventh Nat. Tobey Furniture Co. v. Colby. .... . 592 Bank of Philadelphia v .... . ..... 436 Toledo, P. & W. R. Co., Brown v.. 444 Sherman v. Nutt ..... .. .... . ....... 149 Tomes v. Barney .... . .......... . . 112 Sherwood v. Moore. . . . ............ 109 Towne, Hatch v ........ .. .... . ..... 139 Sidonian, The,`. . .. . .............. 584 Trave1ers’ Ins. Co., Henry v. ....... 15 Sidonian, The, Gentilll v ....., ,. .. . 534 Travers v. Beals ...... . . . ........ 133 Simonds Counter Machinery C0. v. Traversv. Boston Hammock Spread- Young...., .... .... . ........ 517 er Co ...... L .... . .... ........ 133 Sims, Hall v.. . . Q .... . .... . . . ....... 152 Travers v. Nickerson .... . ...... .. .` 133 Singleton, Secor v.; ...... . . . . ..... 376 Tripp v. Appleman ........ . . ...... 19 Skiles, Western v .... . . . . .... . ..... 674 Tuthill Spring Co. v. Shaver Wagon Smith v. Seiberling .... . ........... 677 Co., . . . ....... . ................. 644 Smith v. The Amos D. Carver ...... 665 Tweedy v. The Scotia .... . . ...... . . 907 Smith, Harvey v ............. .. .... 367 _ ' , Smith, United States v .... . . ....... 490 Ulrichs v. Phoenix Horse-Shoe Co. . 308