CASES REPORTED.
ARRANGED UNDER THEIR RESPEOTIVE CIRCUITS
AND DISTRIOTS.
page Pusc
FIRST CIB()U]T_ Hurd v. Snow .... . .......... V. . . .... 423
Morss v. Knazpp ........ . ....... . . . . 218
Potter. The iliza S. .... ; ........... 220
Cmoorr Comvr, D. Mnsssonosmrrs. Russell, The Helena E .... . ........ _ 220
Schroeder v. Comstock .... . ....... 652
A. F. Pike Manuf’g Co. v. Cleveland Schroeder v. Mills,. .... . . . ...... .. . 652
Stone Co., four cases. ............ 896 Schrcederv,W, E.Trubee, four cases 652
Bate Refrigerating Co. v. Hammond 151 Schroeder v. Willett.. .... . ......... 652 .
Casey v. Buttertield ...... . ..... . . . . 77 Sherman v. Nutt. ............ . ..... 149
Gardner v. Prescott .... . .. . . . ..... 516 Thomas v. Williams .... . ....... . .. . 71
. Hgmmferschlag Manuf’g C0. V. 66 Washington Fire & Marine Ins. C0. 477
pa ing ....................... . . v. Chesebro .... . . . . .......... . .. .
Hgmmgrschlag Manuf’g Co. v. 67
pa in . .... .. .................. - CIRCUIT COURT E_ D_ NEW YORK
Hatch v. Towne ...... . . . ... ....... 139 ’ *
Hoyt v. Horne ........ . . .... . . ..... 8°0 .
Moxie Nerve-Food Co. v. Beach .... 465 g$;'§é]§°b%’€€g€T  °''' ' ' ' ' '''' 5%
Simonds Counter Machinery Co. v. . ‘ ‘‘’‘‘'’' ’ " ’ 6 4
Baltunore. The ........ . ........... 1
Young. .... . . .. .... . ............. 517 Bm 84 V The Sous 545
Thomson—Honston Electric Co. v. Bmadin WatCh_(jTB‘8'    2
Citizens' Electric Light C0 .,..... 904 Brooklyn & NPY. Ferry C0: v_ The
Travers v. Beals .... . . .... . ......... 133 Morrmmm 558
Travgrsv. Boston Hammock Spread- 133 CMH S1 B V. Th;  " ‘'''' ‘ ’ ’ ' 921
er ...... . . .... . . . . .... . . . . .... , . '‘''’ ' ''''’
Travem v. Nickerson .... . ......... 133 ggg]t?u`{‘vT2.i;)g?§gL1  ''’'''' ' ' ' ‘  
Westinghouse Electric Co. v. Sun iH0b0k€n'L8ud & Imp_'b’(;_` 
Electr1cCo .......... . ........... 899; Bammorelk'___N._________ _____  
[Hog n,The ary . .........   5·
Cutourr Coonr. D. New Hsursnrnn. [H3;; g. The Pennsylvania Annex 560
o. ........ . ...................
A. F. Pike Manuf’g Co. v. Cleveland Hooper v. The Mary N. Hogan., . . . 554
Stone Co., four cases .... . . ...... 896 Eerl; v. The Jer? E. More . . . ......  
ac awanna, e... .... .. ........ ..
Mary   Hlogan, The... . ...........  
sceo a, e ...................... .
SECOND CIRCUIT. Pennsylvania R. C0. v. The Lacke-
' wanna .............. . . .... . ...... 614
¤¤=<>¤¤* Cem- D- ¤¤N¤E¤¤¤¤T· Ei§‘;”§$i‘ gi.`§£B'°i£iESTi o.;ii‘.;.£.IIZ1 $3%
Ansonia Brass & Copper Co. v. Elec-   ggzsnagéghéugellue Aildersom     '  
' tricSuppHCo.. ......... . ........ 68 Solis Tbb   545
Biggie ·¤P ¤g¤¤g* M¤¤¤f’g 00- V- ,748 swajne V. `eagimai. lns.·Coi ...... I r
ares ar er o ..... .. ....   · S · »
Champlin v. The Helena E. Russell 220 Umm] In ' C0' v' The Bridgeport ` $24,
Edison Electric Light Co. v. New
Haven Electric Co., two cases .... 233 Drsrmcr Coonr, E. D. Naw Yom:.
Eliza S. Potter, The ................ 220
Helena E. Russel], The. .... . .... . . . 220 Alesia, The .... . . .... . . . .... . . .. . . . 581.
. · (xv)
v.35F.—b