CASES REPORTED. Lxvii
- Page Page
Wright v. The Alaska ...... . ....... 555 CIRCUIT Courvr, D. NEW Jnnsmv.
Drew ¤¤¤M· S- D- N¤rY<>¤K· M€££L“§§..Z...T’?T??Y‘?? . T???????: 400
Amos r>. 66..6., The .... .. ........ 665 N=gi¤¤¤* §,¤¤·¤-M¤¢¤1R¤¤¤¤6¤¤- r- 658
A Ardan S. S. Co. v. Theband .... . . . . 620 S .b“";°g     ····   ····   ·····
Balmer v. The City of Truro ....... 317 ell; ar k}Lu{) er lm up f, °‘ v' 509
Behrens v. The Furnessia ....   798 cwar u ucawr anu g C°· ·
Bischoif v. The W. J. McCaldin .... 330
Bunker v. The W. J. McCaldin .... 330 Drsrmor Counr, D. NEW Jansnv.
Carver, The Amos D ............... 665
City of Truro, The ................. 317 Kretzmer v. The William A. Lever-
Compagnie Générale Transatlan- ing ...... . . ........ , ....... ` ...... 783
Dtiqueqv. Hoguet ................. 835
rew, he ....   ............ ....789 i , `
Fndicott vTTl1e Amos D. Carver. . . 265 URCUIT Comm" E' D` PENMYLVANIL
arragut, he ........ . . ......... . . 17
Fiarez v. The seem ......... .. .... 916   ?"é'§;.;(;éé ············ ·· ···‘  
Force Cv. Providence Washington 767 ' '`'°'''`‘` ' ‘ ' °'’°’ '
5933};,10}:           36 DISTRICTVCOURT, E. D. PENNSYLVANIA.
cases .......... . ..... . ..... . . .... 5 _
Harbinger v. The Amos D. Carver 665 Isaac H· TINY9i', Tm?. V- The T· _J-
Harvey v. Smith _,,__ . __,,,,_, , ,,,_ 367 SCIIUYIGI'. .... . . ...... . . . .. . . .. . . . 551
Heipershausen v. The Amos D. Car- 6
ver ...... . ............. .. ....   65 (3 (3 _w_D_p ~ _
Johnson v. The Portueuse. .... . .... 670 IRCUIT OURT EL NSYLVANIA
L’AY¤€fi<1¤€. The -·-- · -·--····-··-- 835 Ellis v. Reynolds .............. . . . . 394
Lawrenceville 06m6m? Cu- V· The Jacobus v. Monongahela Nat. Bank I
Susquehanna ..-- - ·--.·-··--··-·- 320 of Brownsville ........... . ....   395
Lehigh Goal & Nav. Gu. v. The McCarthy v. cmk. ............   360
Amos D. Carver .............. . . . . 665 Reiter v_ Jones & Laughlin ____ i _ _ _ 421
¥¤¤M¤¤wr vLTh¤ Sammy -------··- 327 Satterield v. Malone ............... 445
cAdams v. everich .......... .   05 Wqr {gt S d (3 ____ _ _____ 369
M6o6m1¤,T1i6 w. J. ............... 660 I mms V U an °
%§R?n3}%YBEg;  I 3             DISTRICT Counr, W. D. PENNSYLVANIA.
i6L€‘lY6'£§‘i?§.?‘ai;1:;;:;::;;;:;;; 335 ],>=»=¤r=»1g=-;¤6,,T¤;·--·&·6 ----· M M
Petrie v. Heller .... . ............... 310 ages. lag? S On °‘ v' ° 785
Portuense, The .... . ............... 670 K .am° “m°·. ·········‘‘•‘······ 85
sammy, rh. ......... . . .. .... . . .... 327 ¤¤¤¤· The Dam -·-···-··-----··· 7
Scotia, The .... . ..... ’ · ...... . . . . .... 907 I
Smith v. The Aimlos D. Carver ......  
usquehanna, e ............. . . . . ·
Swan v. Five Hundred and Fifty FOURTH CIRCUIT'
T Tong Reserveéloal. ........ . .....   _
wee yv. he cotia .... . ......... 9 C , V (3 ,])_M _
wr?h1s{vbPhmni'§` Horse-Shoe C0. . 303 IRCUU OURT ARILAND
. . caldin, he ........   .... 33 (3h ]] _]; dh ____ __ _______ 923
Wm.   Nicol, TDC. . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . .   Ggzggsor v]'{0]§g]·f,S ]&:;vLaug, The, v_
Wright v-The Farragut ·-·-··.-·--· 617 United states ........ . . .. .... . . .. 926
Grailiin v. Nevassa Phosphate Co. . 474
CIRCUIT COURT. D. VERMONT. Hancock Inspirator Co. v. Reges— 61
er .... . ......................... .
Sowles v. Witters. .... . . . . .... . .... 463 Leibrandt & McDowell Stove Co. v.
Witters v. Sowles. ................ . 640 Fireman’s Ins. Co. of Baltimore., 30
gumfgréi Chemie]? Wlfrks v. Muth..  
· nite tates v. att ews .... .. ....
THIRD CIRCUIT.
_ _ D1sT1ucT COURT, D. Mmvnmn.
°“‘°““ °°““"* D" DE""·W"“‘“· 6. r, nm, rim ........ .. .... . ..... 535
Creamer v. Bowers. .... . . . .... . . .. . 206 Murguiondo v. The B. F. Hart .... . 535