cases anronran. ix l Page Page Geis v. Kimber. ..,. ............... 105 Huntington v. Hartford Heel·P1ate George v. The Aerouaut .... . ...... 497 Co. ..... , .................... . .... 689 Gesswein, Joel v. ...... . ........ . 592 Husted. The J. W ......... . .... 604 Gest, South Covington & O. St. Ry. Co. v .... . . .... . ........... 307 lllinois Cent. R. Co., Jessup v ...... 735 Gibson v. Peters, two cases .... . .... 487 International Co. of Mexico, Deni Giles v. Paxson .... . . .......... . . . . 882 ton v.. ....... . ........ . ....... 1 Gilmour, McConville v., two cases., 156 Interstate Lumber Co., Kansas City Gilmour, McConville v .... . .. . .... , 277 & T. Ry. Co. v. .................. 9 Glenn v. Foote. ............... . . . . 824 Investment Co. v. Ohio do N. W. R. Gofs Adm'r v. Norfolk & W. R. , Co ............ . .... . ....... . ..... 48 Co ................... . ........... 299 Irons v. Manufacturers Nat. Bank 843 Goldsmith v. Holmes. . . ...... .... 484 I. do V. Florio S. S. Co., Morrison v. 569 Goldsmith v. The Syracuse. ....... 830 Goodrich Transportation Co. v. Jack Sen, In re .... ... ....... ...... 441 Gagnon... , .... . ......... . . . . .... 123 Jackson v. McLean.. . .... . .... . .. . 213 ‘ Goree v. Parker ............ . ....... 840 Jackson, State of Tennessee v. .... . 258 Gotschall, Marvin v. .... . .... . ..... 314 Jacobs Electric C0., Bntz Thermo- Gotshall. Marvin v ................. 908 Electric Regulator Co. v... ...... . 191 Grand Rapids & I. R. Co. v. Spar- James, McCormack v. ..... .. ....... V 14 · row. .... . . .................. . .... 210 James Farrell, The ........ . ....... 500 Graziano v. The Boskenna Bay .... 697 James Farrell, The, Rickard v. .... . 500 Green v. Pennsylvania R. Co ....... 66 James H. Prentice, The .... . ....... 777 Gregory v. Boston Safe-Deposit & James H. Prentice, The, Myles v.. . 777 Trust Co ........ .. .. . ...... ..... 408 Jessup v. Illinois Cent. R. Co...,. .. 735 Grifdn v. Macon County. .... . ...... 885 Joel v. Gesswein ................... 592 Grimes v. Pennsylvania Co .... . . . . 72 Johnston, Farguson v .............. 134 Jones, United States v .... .. ...... , 759 Hager, Ames v ....... . ............ 129 J. W. Husted, The ............... .. 606 Hale & Kilburn Manuf’g Co. v. Hart- J. W. Husted, The, Havens v. ...... 604 ford Woven Wire Mattress Co. . . 762 _ Hall, Bradford v ...... . . . . ......... 801 Kainer v. The Berggnseren. . .` .. . . 700 Hamblet v. City Ins. Co ...... .. . .. . 118 Kansas City & T. y. Co. v. Inter- Harding v. Vaughn .... . ........ .. . 742 state Lumber Co .... . . .. .... .. . 9 Hardy v. Minneapolis & St. L. Ry. Kehlor Milling Oo., Adams v ....... 212 Co.... .... .... .. .......... ....657 Keller,Inre .... .. ...... . ..... . 681 Harper v. Norfolk & W. R. Co. . . . 102 Keyes v. Pueblo Smelting & Refin- Hartford Heel-Plate Co., Hunting- ing Co .... .. . .... ............ 179 ton v .... . . .............. . . .... . . 689 Kimber, Geis v .......... . .......... 105 Hartford Woven Wire Mattress Co., King, Boyer v ........ . ........ . . . . 899 Hale & Kilburn Mannf’g Co. v. . . 762 . Hartford & N. Y. Transp. Co. v. Larrabee, Welles v. .... .... 866 The Sammie ........ . . ........ .. 568 La Scala v. McIntyre .......... . .... 707 Harvey, Choteau v .... . ........ . . .. 541 La Scala v. The Serapis ............ 707 Hatch v. The Newport .... . ..... 910 Leake v. Virginia, T. & C. S. do I. Hatch v. Young ....... .. . ........ . 898 Co .... . ............ . ............ . 6 Havemeyer, Smith v .......... . . .. 927 Lehigh & W. Coal Co., Morse v.... 831 Havens v. The J W. Husted. .. .... 604 Leonard Richards, The .... . . . . .... 914 Hazzard v. O’Bannon ....... . ..... 854 Letters Rogatory from First District Heddon, National Hat -Pouncing Judge of Vera Cruz, In re ........ 306 Mach. Co. v. ........ . ............ 317 Levally, United States v. ........ . . . 687 Hershey v. O’Neill ........ . ........ 168 Levering, The W A,. .... . . . .... .. . 511 Heye v. North German Lloyd. ..... 705 Lewis, United States v. .... . ..... .. 449 Hills v. Mackill. . .................. 702 L’Hommedieu v. The Carondelet. . . 714 Hilton, People v ........ . .......... .172 Lillientlial v. Wallach .... . . . ...... . 255 Hines, Card v .... . . .... . ..... . ..... 573 Lloyd. Dize v. ................ . .... 651 - Hintrager v. Nightingale .... . .... . . 847 Loague v.TaxingDistrictof Browns- Hintrager, Robinson v .... . . . ...... 752 ville ...... . . .... . ................ 149 Holberg, The Ludvig .... . . .... . . . . 914 Locke v. Smith .... . ....... . ....... 310 Holland v. Seven Hundred and Low v. Barstow Stove Co .... .. .... 903 Twenty—Five Tons of Coal ....... 785 Low v. Magee Furnace Co .......... 903 Holmes, Goldsmith v. ............. 484 Lowndes v. The Phoenix .... .. ..... 272 Horner, Yearian v ........ . . ....... 130 Ludvig Holberg, The .......... . .... 914 Houck, Fraker v. ........ . ..... . . . . 403 LudvigLHolberg, The, and The Leon- Hunt v. Oregon Pac. Ry. C0.. .... . . 481 ard ichards, Stafford v ...... . . . . 914