X' CASES ' REPORTED.
'_ y Pagq Page
Ludvig{Holberg, The. and TheLeon-`A Missouri, The. and The Marion W.
ard ichards`, The F. O. Matthias'- _ Page., .   . ...................... 329
sen & Wiechers Sugar Rennery Missouri Glass Co., Schneider v .... 582
Oo. v. .................... .. , .... . . 914 Missouri', K. & T. Ry. Co., Barry v. 228
Luther v. The City of SpringEeldL. . 568 Missouri, K.,& T. Ry. Co., Mercan· ,
Luttke v. The 'Brucklay Castle ..... _ 923 tile Trust Co. v. .‘ ...... . ..... . . . . 221
Lykus, The. ,. .. .. ....... . . L .. .L .. . 919 Missouri Pac. R. Co. v. Texas &
Lykus, The, Salmon v. .... . ........ ‘ 919 Pac. R. Co ....................... 879
‘ V ‘ Q Mitchell, United States v ........ .. . 492
Maben v. Virginia, T. & C. S. &’ I. Moelle, Sherwood v..; ..... L ....... 478
Co ....   . ..... . . ..... .,. ...... L 6 Monarch, The Egyptian. ........... 773
Mackill, Hills v ........ . . ..... ..'. . . 702 Montgomery v. United States. . .... 4
Macon County, Griilin v. .. . ...... . 885 Moore v. The Mary Powell.._ ..... . . 598
Magee Furnace C0., Low v.. L . . .... 903 Moore v. The Rosa .........   .... . . . 602
Manard. Preston v. . . L.   .. . . .,.. 557 .Morrison v. I. & V. Florio S. S. Co. 569
Mansfield. °C‘ &` L. M. R. Co., Fos-.. £Mors‘e v; Lehigh & W. Coal‘Co ..... 831_
terv .... . ........ . ............‘ . ". 627 Myles v. The .lames`H. Prentice .... 777
Manufacturers' Nat._Bank, Irons   843 9 °
, Marion W Page, The. and The Mis· ‘ . National Hat-Pouncing Mach. Co. . ,
‘ souri.. ........ ‘   .....   ......... 329 ` »v. Brown ........ .` ....   ....... 317
Martin v. Roberts.... ........ ......_. 217 National Hat-Pouncing Mach. Co.
Marvin v. Gotschall..‘.. . ....... ..   314 lv. Hedden. ..... " .... .. ............ 317
Marvin v. Gotshal1.. ..... . .... .... . 908 Neal v. Foster ....... _ .............. 29
Mary Powell, The; ......... . .... .,. .` 598 Neshit v. The Amboy and The
Mary Powell, The, 'Moore v ........ 598 Transfer No. 2. ............. . .. . 925
Mary Powell Steam—Boat Co. v. The . Newberry v. Robinson .......... .. . 841
Philip Sinnott.., . . . ...... . ....... 598 New`Haven Steam—Boat Co. v. The
Mathias, United States v. .‘ ....... - .. 892 . Mayor ........... . .... . . . ........ 716
Mayor, The, NewHaven Steam·Boat` . Newlands vi Terry.. . . .... . ....... 337
Co. v...` .... ' ......... L `. ........ . .L 716 New Orleans Water-Works C0. v.
McAllister, McLaughlin v. . . .. . . .. . 745 McGinnis Oil & Soap Works ..... 833
McConnell v. Simpson. ........... Q. 750 New Orleans Water—Works Oo. v.
McConville‘ v. Gilmour, two cases. . '156 People'sIce Co. .... . . .... . . .... . . 833
McConville v. Gilmour ............. , 277 New Orleans Water—Works Co. v. ’ "
McCormack v. James .... . ......... ‘ . 14 Southern Brewing Co ............ 833
McGinnis Oil *& Soap Works, New Newport, The ............... .. . .... 910
Orleans Water-Works Co. v ...... 833 Newport, The, Hatch v. ............ 910
McIntosh v.Chicag*o, M.‘& St. P. Ry. ` New York Harbor Tow—Boat C0. v.
Co,. . .· . .... ‘ .’; ........ .’ ...... L .... 661 , The Mercedes .... . .......... . .,.. 602
McIntyre, La Scala v. ...... . .... . . . 707 ‘New‘York Transit & Terminal Co., ‘
McKee v. Simpson ......... . ....... 248 `Garrett v. ...... . ........   ...... 513
McLaughlin v; McAllister. . . .... ,. . . 745 NewYork & Boston Rapid Transit ’
McLean, Jackson v.,_. .... . ..... . .. . 213 Co. v. Parrott. .’ L ..   .... . .   .... 462
‘ McMurray v. Emerson ........ . .... 901. Nightingale, Hintrager v .... . ...... 847
Melville. The Thomas .... . ..... ‘. ... 708 Nith, The ...... . . .. . . . .... . .... .. . . 86
Menominie, The.;. .· ..... . .....   . .‘ 197 Nith, The .... . .... . .... . . . . ........ 383
Mercadante v. The Boskenna Bay. . 697 Nith, The, Thompson v ............ 86
Mercantile Trust Oo. v. Missouri, K. Nith, The, Thompson v ............ 383
& T. Ry. Co.. .... . ............... 221 Norfolk & W. R. Co., Goff’s Adm’r
Mercanti e Trust & Dep. Co. v. . v. ................................ 299
Rhode Island Hospital rust Co.. 863 Norfolk & W. R. Co., Harper v .... 102
Mercedes, The .............. , ...... 602 Northern Pac. R. C0. v. United
Mercedes, The, New York Harbor States .......... . .....,.......... 282
Tow—Boat Oo; v. .......... . . . .. . 602 Northern Pac. R; Co., Sorenson v.. 166
Merrick Thread Co., Coats v. ...... 324; North German Lloyd, Heye v ...... 705
` Meteor, The, Sacqueland v. .... . . . . 566 North Pac. G. R. Co., Schwerin v.. 710
Metropolitan Nat. Bank v. St. Louis ` Northwestern Life Ass’n, Stanley v. 75
Dispatch Co; ....   .... . ........ '722 Norton ’ v. Taxing District of
Michele, Olmstead v. ....... . . . L. ·. . . 455 Brownsville .......... . ........ . . 99
Milner, United States v.. ........... 890 Nugent, Frelinghuysen v .... . . .... 229
Minneapolis & St. L. Ry. Co., Hardy ,
v.. .... . ..... . .................... 657 Oakes, The T. F. . . .. . ............. 442
Mirto v. The Boskenna Bay ........ 697 O’Bannon, Hazzard v.   . .......... 854
Mississippi Valley Bank, Wool- Obermiller v. Wylie. ........... . . . . 641
dridge v ......................... 97 Ocean S. S. Co. v. The Talisman .... 600