X11 CASES REPORTED.
’ g Page Page
South Covington & C. St. Ry. Co. v. United States v. Allen .... ... .... . .. 174
.Gest .... . . .... . . . .... . .... °. . . ..§ .807 United States v. Barry.. .... . . . . ... 246
Southern Brewin Co., New Orleans United States v. Bornemanu ....... 257
Water-Works 50. v ..... . .... . . . . 833 United States v. Church of the Holy
Southern Pac. Co., Wedekind v .... 279 Trinitgv .... . ......... . ........... 803
South Spring Hill Gold Min. O0., United tates v. Cook .............. 896
Amador Medean Gold Min. C0. v. 668 United States v. Felderward .... ... 490
Southworth v.` Reid .......... . ..... 451 United States v. Gabriel ....... . .... 888
Sparrow, Grand.Rapids& I. R. C0. v. 210 United States v. Jones .... . . . ...... 759
Spencer, Bottomly v. .... .. . ...... . 782 United States v. Levally . ...... .... 687
Spriugiield, The ity of . . .. . .... . . 568 United States v. Lewis ............. 449
Stafford v. The Ludvig Holberg and United States v. Mathias . .... . . . .. . 892
The Leonard Richards .... . . ..... 914 United States v. Milner. ....... . .... 890
Stanley v. Northwestern Life Ass’n 75 United States v. Mitchell ....... .... 492
State v. Baltimore & O. R. Co ...... 655 United States v. Oliver,.-. . ...... .. . 758
State of Tennessee v. Jackson.   .. 258 United States v. Peachy ......... . .. 160
Steam-Ship Samana, The, v. The United States v. Trainor.. .... . ..... 176
Erin ...... . . .‘ .... . ........ ..... .. 712 United States v. Two Bay Mules .... 84
Steam Transp. Co., Clyde v ....   . 501 United States, Dimmick v .......... 82
Stegner v. Blake .... . ..... . ..... . .. 183 United States, Fish v. ...... . .... . . . 677
Stewart v. The Sun ...... . . . .... .. . 307 United States, Montgomery v.. ..... 4
Stewart v. The_ Tribune. . . . .... . . . . 807 United States, Northern Pac. R. Co. ‘
Success, The .......... . .... .... . .... 604 v ..... . ................. . ........ 282
Success, The, Rogers v ........ . .... 604 United States, Rand v ............. . 671
Sun, The, Stewart v. .... ._ .......... 307 United States. Sioux City & St. P. R.
Sweet, in re. ....   ....   ..... 761 ’Co. v. .... . . ....... L ....... . .... 610
_ Syracuse, The ....... Q ....... . .... .. 830 United States, Van Buren v.. .. .... 77
Syracuse, The, Goldsmith v .... .... 830 Upton v. Wayland ..... ; ........... 691
Talisman, The, Ocean S. S. Co. v.. . 600 Van Buren v. United States .... .... 77
Taxing District of Brownsville, Vaughn, Harding v... ..... .... ... 742
Loague v...`. . .. . .... . . ...... . .... 149 Vernon, The. ...... .' . . . ...... . ..... 118 ·
Taxing District of Brownsville, Nor- Vicksburg1_& M. R. Co., Connor v. . 278
ton v..";  ...... . ......... .. .... 99 Virginia, . & C. S. & I. Co., Doo-
Terry, Inre..‘ ....... .... ........... 419 Mleyv.   ......   ......   6
Terry, Newlands v .... ...... .... .. . 837 Virginia, T. &C. S. &I. Co.,Leake v. 0
Terry, Sharon v. .... .. .... . ........ 837 Virginia, T. & C. S. & I. C0., Ma-
Texas & Pac. R. Co., Missouri Pac. ·ben v .................. . ........ 6
R; Co. v. ........... · ...... . ...... i 879 Virginia, T. & C. S. &I. Co., Pace v. 6
Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. City of Baton Virginia, T. &C. S. & I. Co., Seddon
Rouge. ....... ·. .... .............. 845 v., two cases ...... . .............. 6
T. F. akes; The .... . . .... ........ 442 Virginia, T. & C. S. & I. Co., W. C.
T. F. Oakes, The, Raftery v........ 442 Seddonv................. ....   6
Thomas v. Peoria & R. I. Ry. Co. . . 808 Vos. Robb v .... . ..... ; .... . ....... 132
Thomas, Inre ........ ............. 242 Vulcanite Par. Co. v. American Ar-
Thomas Melville, The. . . ..... .. . .... 708 ti1icial*Stone Pavement C0. .... . . 878
Thomas Melville, The, Win d m u1 ·
° ler v .... .. .... .. ....   .....   708 Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co., Cen-
Thompson v. The Nith.; ........... 86 tral Trust C0. v ........... .. ..... 622
Thompson v. The Nith ............. 883 Wadsworth, Beirne v ....... ....... 614
Thorp, Campbell Printing-Press W. A. Levering, The. .... . .....   511
Co. v 4 . . .... . .... . . . ... .......... 414 W. A. Levering, The. Darrow v .... 511
Tong Wah Sick, In re .... . .. ... .. .. . 440 Wallach, Lillienthal v .... . . . . .... . . 255
Trainor, United States v .... ... ..... 176 Walsh Brothers, The. Disbrow v... . 607
Trautman, Armstrong v.. ....... ... 275 Watkins, Otley v.. . . .. .. .... ...... . 823
Tribune, The, Stewart v ............ 307* Wayland, Upton v ................ . 691
Trow City Directory C0. v. Curtin., 829 W. C. Seddon v. Virginia, T. & C.
Turner, Bradford v ............ . .. . 801 S. & I. Co.. .... . ....... . .... ..... 6
Two Bay Mules, United States v... . 85 Webster v. Ellsworth .... . ...... .. . 827
‘ ‘ · Wedekind v. Southern Pac. Co ..... 279
Union Mutt Life Ins. Co. v. Win- Welles v. Larrabee.; ..... . ......... 866
dett. .... . . .   .................. . . 838 Westervelt v. The Boskenna Bay.. . 697
Union Pac. Ry. Co., Choteau v ..... 541 Wilkinson, Beattie v. .... . . . .... .. . 646
United Nickel Coi v. Central Pac. Williams v. The Olive Baker..?. ... 717
R. C0.. ...........,............... 186 Wilson v. Seligman................ 154