cases REPORTED. xix ·
Pnze Page
Rcyer v. King ....... . . . . .......... 899 Cmcurr COURT, W. D. Iowa.
Royer v. Richman .... . ............ 899
Royer v. Russell .,.. . .... . . . . ...... 899 Buford v. Cook. ..... . ............. 21
Drsrmcr Comvr, D. Inmaru. Cmcorr Courur, D. Kansas.
Van Buren v. United States .... . . . . 77 Fraker v. Houck ................... 403
p Mercantile Trust Co. v. Missouri, K.
CIRCUIT COURT, D_ WISCONSIN, W_ D_ & T. Ry. Co. .... . .......... . ..... 221
Southworth v. Reid. ............... 451 Cmomr COURT, D. MINNESOTA.
. Beirne v. Wadsworth. .. .... .. .... 614
Cmonrr Comvr. E. D. Wisconsm. Hgrdy vi Minneapolis & St. Ll Ry- 657
Butz Thermo-Electric Regulator Co. °·. ············‘···‘·•*• • '‘‘‘ · ‘ ‘ ‘
v. Jacobs Electric Co. ........ . . . . 191 %°“V{H v' g°£sgh?}l‘ ‘''’ ‘ ‘*°·•‘‘'‘‘  
Cartier v. The F. & P. M. No. 2 .... 264 Ma?"" Yi 0;. “ ··     ·
Clews v. Bardon .... . .............. 617 ggI2¤ v' C 1°ag°· ‘ t" ‘ y' 661
F. & P. M. No. 2, The ..... . ........ 264 · ···· · ·*····· · ········ · ····· . · ··
Goodrich Transportation Co. v. l Ngigggn Pac' R· C0' v" Umwd 282
Gagnon '''''‘ ’ '`'''''’ ' ' '''' ` ° ' ’ 12*3 Porter v. Sabin. .... . . .... . .. .... .. . 475
Sorenson v. Northern Pac. R. Co., . 166 _
Drsrrmor Connr, E. D. Wisconsin.
Holland v. Seven Hundred and DISTRICT COURTI DI MINNESOTA
TII2·III·FII<= 'I`¤·II III *22*- -··-·- 784 Keller, In .. ...... . ........... . .... 681
Menominie, The,. .... . ............. 197
EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Cmcuir Comer, E. D. Missoum, E. D.
CIIICIIII ¤<>¤I<I· D- ¤<II·<>I<—I—II<I· §§]$'$`€`. Y;. I1$gii$°.§  wi]? fill 1 1111  
. . 1 ‘   ..... . . .. .... I
Kgggggé P¤2I>I·> SIIIIIIIIII2- *2 R2¤¤· 179 oSZ`{YLiI*1—i..1”oi}?v. w.11..11, st. 1..
g_II»?;y·¤- XI I2 - M ·. —--· &   - 1.- -- 242 .£.E.‘€?v?€1.....‘1. 11i11i a.::: S35
30 V- SPED mmg uw [mg 25 Fotheringhamv.Adams Express C0. 252
°·’ ···· ‘ · · ······•···‘··•‘······· Hazzard v. O’Bam1on ............. 854
. Jackson v. McLean .... .. ........... 213
Cmcurr Counr, N. D. lows. Metropolitan Nat. Bank v. St. Louis
Dispatch Co. .... . ................ 722
Sioux City 80 St. P. R. C0. v. United Schneider v. Missouri Glass C0 .... . 582
States. ............. . . . .... . ..... 610 Shannon v. Bruner ................. 147
United Statesv. Allen .............. 174
IIIIIIIIII ·¤·>IIII» II- II Im. 2- II ¥“.3Li?§.”..S1'i$€?.11;:;;:::::::1::;: {S5
Ea le Manuf’g Co. v. Chamberlain
1511111 Co ....................   905 DIBTRKT OMIM. E. D- MISSOURI. E. D.
Giles v. Paxson ............ . . . . .... 882
Hintrager v. Nightingale. .... . . .... 847 ggggggg ;* 2%; l$`?°°t“]‘ ······ · ····  
]?'¥>lHuso¤Iv.H11;)trager .... . ........ g52 Dacotah The Y°ml“g ········ · 493
. ° °“ "· “"“· °°· ···· · ····   ··‘· 66 wy.111111}1 The ................. 1.1. me
CIIIIIIIIT <><>III=I· S- D- 1222- 11....... ¤......s.1>.11.......,11. 11.
Clow V. Baker .... ........... ...... 692 Grimum Macon COunty________"U 885
Cmouir Coorvr, S. D. IOWA, C. D. (jmcrwr (ifguivr,   D. Mrssoum, ST.
Boardman v. Blizzard .... . . ........ 26 OSEPH IWBI01"
Harding v. Vaughn ........... . .... 742 McLaughlin v. McAllister ...... . . . . 745