CASES REPORTED.
. Page Page
Cheesman v. Shreve .... . ........ .. 36 D. M. Osborne & C0. v. Missouri
Chemical Nat. Bank, Armstrong v.. 466 Pac. Ry. Co .... . ............. . . .. 830
Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co., State of _ · Domestic Sewing-Machine Co..
lowav.... .... . ......... . .... ....497 Morssv ..... .. .... .. ...... .. ..... 352
Chicago. M. & St. P. Ry. Co., Mc— ' Dnden v. Maloy. .... .. . .. . ........ . 98
Guire v .......................... 54 Duer v. Corbin Cabinet Lock Co. . . 338
Chicago & C. S. Ry. C0., Thomas
v. .... . . ...... . ................... 548 Eagle Lock Co., Corbin Cabinet
C. H. Northam, The, Milliken v.   238 Lock Co. v ........... . . .......... 338
Chubb, Olivari v ........... . . .... . . 894 Eastman v. Sherry ................. 844
Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. C0., East da West R. Co., American Loan
Huskins v .... . . . . .... . .......... 504 & Trust Co. v.... ............ . . . . 242
City of Brockton, The ...... . ...... 897 Eaton v. Neumark .... . . .... . ...... 375
City of Brockton, The, Cornell Elder, The ...... . .................. — 903
Steam-Boat Co. v .......... . . .... 897 Elder, The, New York, L. E. & W.
City of Hamilton, Hamilton Gas- R. Co. v. .......... . ............. 903
Light & Coke Co. v .... . . . . ...... 832 Elliot v. The Stalford. ............ 811
City of Milwaukee v. The Curtis, The Emma, The. White v ............... 703
Camden. and The Welcome .... . . 705 Ennis, McKay v.. .... . ............. 229
City of St. Paul. Hennessyv .... ... 565 Erwin v. United States. .... . ....... 470
City of Salem, The. .... . ....... . . . . 846 Every v. The Hull of the Edgar Bax-
Clark. United States v ..... . ....... 106 ter. .............................. 219
Clayton. Rein v .... . . . . .... . ....... 854
Co n, Brigham v .... . .... . ....... 688 Falk v. T. P. Howell & Co.. .... . . . . 202
Connecticut .River Lumber Co., Fechheimer v. Baum. .... . . . . ...... 167
Shampeau v .................. . . . . 771 Feld, Lehman v ............ . ...... . 852
Continental Ins. Co., Thames & Fernoline Chemical Co. v. Carolina
Mersey Marine Ins. C0. v .... . . . . 286 Oil & Creosote Co. .... . . ..... . .. . 348
Coon v. Abbott .... . . .... . . .... .. . . 98 Filli v. Delaware. L. & W. R. Co. . . 65
Cooper v. The Saratoga. . . . ........ 119 First Nat. Bank v. Merchants` Bank 657
Corbin Cabinet Lock C0. v. Eagle Foerster, Young v. .... . . .... . ..... 203
Lock Co ......... . .... . .. .... . . . 338 Forbes, McGuinn v. ...... . .... . . . . 639
Corbin Cabinet Lock Co., _Duer v.. . 338 Fox v. Young ...................... 385
Cornell Steam·Boat Co. v. The City Fox. Young-Iv ...................... 385
of Brockton ...... . . . .... .. . . .. . . 897 Fradley v. · yland . ...... . ....... . . 49
Cornwall v. Davis ........   ....   283 Frankfort Whisky Process Co. v.
Cosenow, In re .................. 1. . . 668 Mill Creek Distilling Co. ......... 533
Coughlin, Hellebush v .... . ........ 294 Frank Sylvia, The, United States v. 155
Council Bluffs Ins. Co., Rosen- Frederick Stearns & Co., Brown
baum v .... . .... . . .... . . .... . . . . 7 Chemical Co. v. .... . . . . .... . . .... 360
Council Bluffs Ins. Co., Rosen- Freeman v. The Undaunted. ....... 662
baum v. . . . .......... . . . . ........ 724 Freund, Untermeyer v. .... . ........ 342
Cougne v. Weatherhead ....... . . .... 16 Fuller v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 163
Cra t, Shaw v .... . . . . .... . ......... 317
Crenshawe v. Pearce ...... . . . . ..... 432 Gaines, Belding v ...... . . . . .... . . . . 817
Cudahy v McGeoch ................ 1 Gandy, Whitcomb v.. ...... . ..... . . 735
Curtis, The, The Camden, and The Gates v. Ryan ..................... 154
Welcome, City of Milwaukee v.. . 705 Geo. D. Barnard & C0. v. Knox
County .......................... 563
Dacotah, The .......... . ....... . . . . 543 Georgia Infirmary for the Relief and
Danace v. The Magnolia ........... 867 Protection of Aged and Ailiicted
Davis v. Read. . .... . ........... . . . . 418 Negroes v. Jones .... . . . . .... . . . . 750
· Davis, Cornwall v. .... . ............ 283 Gerber, Underwood v ....... . ...... 682
Davis, United States v. ............ 468 Gerber, Underwood v .............. 796
Davis, Wakelee v .... . . . . .... . ..... 280 Gibson v. Richmond & D. R. Co... . 743
De Colange v. The Chateau Mar- Gilbert Knapp, The ............   209
gaux ............ . ........ . ...... . 157 Gilbert Knapp, The, Mygatt v. .... 209
, Deguire v. St. Joseph Lead Co ..... 663 Gleason, United States v. .... . . .... 331
Delaware, L. & W. R. Co., Filli v.. 65 Goldsmith v. Tower Hill Steam-Ship
Denver & R. G. R. Co., Union Pac. Co. .............................. 806
Ry. Co. v. ........... .. . . ........ 179 Goldsmith, Lichtenstein v. ......... 359
De Putron, Young v.. . . ........... 46 Goodridge v. Union Pac. Ry. C0.. . 182
' Deyo v. Otoe County ...... . ....... 246 Gordon, Arthur v .................. 558
Dickson v. Lehnen. .......... . ..... 319 Gowdy, United States v ...... . . .... 332
Dixon County, Hedges v ........... 304 G. P. Trigg, The ............. . . . .. . 708