I CASES REPORTED.
Page , Page
Louislana,·The,`Bosentha1 v........ 264 Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co., United
Louisiana & T. RJ &. S. S. C0. v. The States v .... _. ..... ..   r. .· ......... 68
Pomona and Her Cargo .......... 444 Missouri Pac. Ry. C0., D. M. Os-
Louisiana & T. R. &S. S. Co. v. The . borne & Co. v .................... 830
Pomona & Her Oargo..‘...·. .... .. 815 Missouri Val. Life Ins. Co., Inger-
Louis Snyders’ Sons Co. v. Arm- soll v .... . . .   ...... . ........... 530
strong ......_ . ........ '.   ...... . . _ 18 M. M. Chase, The .... . . .... . ....... 708
Louisville &N. R. Co., Kentucky & M. M. Chase, The. Hansen v. ....... 708
I. Bridge C0. v. . . . .. . .... . ....... 567 Montpelier Carriage C0., Stein-
Lovell Manuf’g Co., Cary v. .... . .. . 654 baeh v. . . .......... . .... . . ...... 760
’ ° Moore, Grajy v ............. . ....... 266
MacMaster v. The Sammie and The More, The 0sé E; . . . .... . ......... 122
R. W. Burke .............. . ...... -907 Morris v. Robertson ..... . . . . ...... 199
Magnolia. The, Danace v.. . .... . . . . 367 Morris v. Williamson ....... . ..... 756
Magone, Juillard v. ............ . . .. 857 Morrison v. Miller. ...... . .... . . .. . 82
Magone, Zucker &: Levett Chemical Morss v. Domestic Sewing-Machine .
C0.v .......... ... ...... .. ....   776 Co ...... . ....... . ................ 352
Maloy, Duden v .... .. .. ............ 98 Morss v. Knapp.. ........... . .... . 351
· Maltby v. Graham ....... . ......... 689 Mygatt v. The Gilbert Knapp ...... 209
Manhattan Transp. Co. v. Mayor, r
etc. .... . . ...... . .   ...... . ..; .... 160 Nellie and Annie, The, Peterson v.. 217
Margaret J. Sanford, The .... . . . L. . 148 Neptune Steam Nav. Co. v. Sullivan
Margaret J. Sanford, The, Par- Timber Co. .... .. . . .... . . ........ 159
tridge v ...,............. . ........ 148 Neufeld v. Neufeld. ., ........ . . .... 560
Martha ,Washington Creamery But- Neumark, Eaton v ........... . . .... 375
tered Flour Co. v. Martien ....... 797 NewYork, L. E._& W. R. Co. v. The
M&1‘ll6H,'LT&l'Ih& Washington Cream- Elder ............ . . . ...... . ..... . 903
ery Buttered Flour Co. v. .... . . . . 797 Ninth_Nat. Bank v,. Knox County,. 75
Martin v. One Hundred and Eighty- Norris v. Atlas Steam-Ship Co. .... . 279
Two Thousand Two Hundred and Norris v. Atlas Steam-Ship C0,. .... 426
Fifty-Nine Feet of Hemlock Lum- Northern Ins. Co. Nussbaum v .... . 524 _
, ber .... . ......,   . ............ V . . 415 North German Fire Ins. Co., Abra-
Mason, Gray v ..................... 266 ham v. .......... . ................ 731
Mayor, etc., Manhattan Transp. Norton Door Check & Spring Co. v.
Co. v .......,.... . . . . .... . ....... 160 Hall. .... . .................. . .... 691
McAdams v. Boyer. .... . . . ...... J. . 73 Nussbaum v. Northern Ins. Co ..... 524
McArthur v. Williamson, two eases, 756 .
McAuley, Shieldsv ....... ~ ...... . . .. 302 Ocean Ins. Co., Hall v.. .... . . ...... 371
McCormick v. Jarrett ..........   . 380 Old Colony Steam·Boat Co. v. The
McFarland v. The J. C. Tuthill. .... 714 J. C. Hartt .... ,, ..... . .... ... .... 897
‘ McGee0h, Cudahy-v ................ 1 Olin, Timken v.  ._ ........... . . .. . 205
McGuinn v. Forbes ................ 639 Olivari v. Chubb ............. . . .. . 894
McGuire v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Olivari v. Thames & Mersey Marine
C0 ................   ...... 54 lns.Co.   ..... . ............... 894
McIntyre v. Roeschlaub. ........... 556 One Hundred and Ei hty-Two Thou-
McKay v. Ennis .................... 229 sand Two Hundre§andFifty-Nine _
McKay v. Village of Hyde Park .... 389 Feet of Hemlock Lumber, Mar-
McLean, In re. ..... ,. .... . .. .... . . . . 648 t-in v ............................. 415
McMan_ness v. Paxson. .... . ........ 296 O’Neil v. The I. M. North .... . . . .. . 270
Mead, Scott v. . . .._ ......... . ...... . 865 Ontario. The. .... . ....... . ......... 220
Meagher, United States v. .... .. .. .. 875 Oregon Ry. do Nav. C0., Oregonian _
Mealman v. Union Pac. Ry. Co ..... 189 Ry. Co. v .... . . . ..Q .............. 733
Melloy v. Lehigh 8: W. Coal Co .... 377 Oregonian Ry. Co. v. Oregon Ry. &
Merchants Bank, FirstNat. Bank v. 657 Nav. Co ....... . . . .... . ....... . . . . 733
Merritt, Weilbaoher v. ............. , 85 Osborne & Co. v. Mis_souri P. Ry.C0. 830
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., Fuller v.. 163 Otoe County, Deyo v. .... . . . . .... . . 246
Meyers, Swift v ......... . . . . ...... 37 Owens, United States v .... . . . . .... 112
Mill Creek Distilling Co., Frankfort
Whisky Process Co. v. ........... 533 Paddock v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. "
Miller v. Sharp ...... t .... . . .... . . .. 161 (Jo .... . ........ . . . .. . .... . ....... 841
Miller v. The Argonaut and the John Park v. The Hull of The Edgar Bax-
C. Ingram- ......... . . . . .... . .... 910 ter ............................ .. . 219
Miller, Morrison v ................. 82 Partridge v. The Margaret J, San-
Milliken v. The C. H. Northam .... 238 ford ............................. 148
Mills v. The America .... . ......... 813 Paxson, McManness v.. .... . . ...... 296