CASES REPORTED. ix
V 4 Page Page
Guinault, Western Land & Emigra— Imperial, The, and The S. G. Reed,
tion Co. v. ......... .·. .... ‘ ...... . . 287 Albina Ferry Co. v. .............. 614
‘ · - ` , International, The .... . . . . ...... . . . 856
Hagedon v. Seeberger. ....... . . .... 401 Iroquois, The, Kalien Chemical
Hagood v. Blythe .... . . . . .... . .... 76 Co. v.. .... . ...................... 151
Hahn, Potts v .............. . . ..... 682 Ivanhoe, The .................. . .   765
Hamburg-Amer. Packet Co., Ho- Ivanhoe, The, and The Matthias,
horst v. ........ . ................. 273 The Maggie S. Hart v. ....... . . . 765
Hamilton Fish, The, v. The Excel-
sior. .... . ......... . .............. 272 J arboe v. Templer.. .... . . .......... 213
Hammerschlag Manuf'g Co.v.Wich- Jenkins, Sargent v. .... . ........ .. . 585
elman .... .. . ...... . ........ .. . . 430 Jessie Russell, The, McCreery v... . 624
Hardy, Robison v .... .. ......... ... 49 John G. Stevens, The .... . ........ L 515
Harman, United States v ......... .. 827 John Pridgeon, Jr., The, Bradley v. 261
Harmon v. Smith .... . ....... . ..... 482 John S. Darcy. The, Conover v. .... 619
Harris v. The Ruby ..... . . . .. ...... 622 Johnson v. The Frank S. Hall. ..... 258
Hart, The Maggie S ....... . . . . ..... 765 Jones v. Smith .... . .......... . .... 380
Hatch v. The Newport. .... . ....... 669 Jones v. Southern Ins. Co. . . . ..... 19
Haycock, Walker v. .............. .. 298 Julien Electric Co., Electrical Accu-
Hazard v. Credit Mobilier of Amer- 1g_ mulator Co v. ........ . . .......... 117
ica. .... . ......... . . . .......... . . . o
Hazard v. O’Bann0n ....... . ....... 220 Kaitel v. Wylie .. .... .. .... . ...... 865
Head, Gould v... .... . ......... . . . . 886 Kalion Chemical C0. v. The Iroquois 151
Hedden, Hohenstein v ........ . .... 94 Kansas City, St. J. & C. B. R. Co.,
Hedden, McCoy v. ............... . 89 Chicago, St. P. & K. C. Ry. C0. v. 58
Hedden, Ullmann v .... . ....... . .. . 95 Keely v. Weir.. .... . ............. . . 291
Heiluer, Baxter v ......... . ........ 668 Kehlor Milling Co., Adams v .... . .. 281
Heller v. Magone .... . ............. 908 Kerr, Crouch v .................... . 549
Henderson v. Three Hundred Tons Keystone Bottle Stopper C0., Put-
of Iron Ore .... . ............. . . . . B6 nam v .... . . .... . . ........ . ...... 234
Henry Buck, The ............. . .. . 611 Kidney v. The Ocean Prince ....... 259 ,
Henry Buck, The, Stakes v.  . . .... 611 Kiernan v. The Leonard Richards. . 767
Hill, Moore v. .... . ........... . .... 830 Klaber, Edison v. .... .. . ..... . ..... 744
Hitchcock, Wanneker v ..... . ...... 383
. H. L. Dayton, The, Cornell Steam- La Gascogne, ........ . . . . .......... 853
Boat Co. v .................. ; .... 927 Lamb v. Robertson ....   .   ...... 716 .
H. L. Dayton, The, L’Hommedieu v. 926 Lang v. Lynch .... . ....... . .... . . . . 489
Hoeihnghoff, Edwards v.. .... . ..... 685 Leggett v. Standard Oil Co., . .. ..... 842
Hoffman v. Manufacturers' Mut. Lemoine v. Dunklin County ........ 567
Fire Ins. C0 .... . ................. 487 Leonard v. White’s Golden Lubrica-
Hogg v. The Pennsylvania Annex tor Co ........... .. ..... .. ....... 922
'No. 3. ..................... . ..... 620 Leonard Richards, The, Kiernan v. 767
Hohenstein v. Heddon ..... i ...... . . . 94 Levy v. Robertson .... . .......... . . 714
Hohorstv. Hamburg-Amer. Packet Lewarne v. Mexican International
Co ........................... .... 273 Imp. C0 .... . . .... . .............. 629
Hollender v. Magone. .... . . . . ...... 912 Le Warne v. Meyer .... . .......... . 191
Hoover, Gordon v .... . .... . ........ 592 L’Hommedieu v. The H. L. Dayton 926
Hoskins, Berthold v .......... . ..... 772 Lockhart v. Memphis & L. R. R. Co. 274
_ Houckv. Southern Pao. Ry. Co .... 226 Loney, In re ........ . ....... . .... .. 101
Houston & T. C. Ry. Co., Easton v. 12 Loomis v. Rutland R. Co. . . . ...... 280
Houston8s T. C; Ry. Co., Easton v. 784 Lopez v. The Cachemire ........... 518
Howk v. Wylie .... . .... . .... . .... 865 Loud v. The R. S. Carter and The
Hoyne v. United States .... . . .   . . 542 John G. Stevens ....... . .. . ...... 515 o
Huber v. N. O. Nelson Manuf’g Co. 830 Lnckemeyer v. Magone .... Q. ...... 30
. Hudson v. Bishop. ........ . . . . .... . 680 Lynch, Lang v. .... . ..... . ......... , 489
Hudson City, The. ...........   .. 446 Lyon, Smithv., .... . ......... ....... 53
Hudson City, `The, Bush v ........ . 446 Lytle, Town of Lansing v ....   204
Hunter, Patchin v. .... . ..... · ...... .` 51 . .
Hurd v.~Gere ..... . . ...... . . . QQ . .... 537 MacDonald v. McLean. ............. 328
Hutchinson Smoke-Burner Co., Maggie S. Hart. The ............ . . . 765
Flint v .... . .................. . .. . 546 Maggie S. Hart, The, v. The Ivanhoe -
» » ' and The Matthias.   . ....   ....   765 .
1. L. Fisher, The, New York, L. E. Magone, Heller ,v. . . ............... 9 8
& W. R. Co. v.. .... . .........   . 619 Magone,H0llenderv .... . ..... , ..... 912
Imperial Redning Co. v. Wyman., . 574 Magone, Luckemeyer v ...... . ..... 30