D X11 CASES REPORTED. _ Page - Page Thompson v. Cotlln .... .. ........ . . 112 Wabash W. Ry. C0,. United States Thompson vi Rand-Avery Supply Trust Co. v. ·. . . .... . . .... . ....... 891 Co .... . .... . . . . .... . . .... . ..... Q . 112 Wagner Palace Car Co., Pullman Thompson, Fagan v .... . .... . ..... 467 Palace Car Co. v. ............ .. .. 416 Thomson v. Smith& Griggs Manuf’g Wakelee v. Davis. . . . .... . ......... 878 Co .... . . . .. .... . .. .... . . . ....... . 602 Walker v. Cronkite ...... . . . . ...... 298 Thomson, Smith v .... . . . .... . . .... 604 Walker v. Haycock .... . . . . .... . . . . 298 Thouron v. East Tennessee, V. 80 G. Walker v. 0’Niell. . .... . . .......... 374 Ry. C0 ........................... 673 Walker v. Seeberger. . . ........... . 724 Three Hundred Tons of Iron Ore, Walker v. Sturbans .... . ........ 298 _ Henderson v .................... . 36 Wallace v. Myers .... . ............. 184 Three Rivers Manuf’g C0., Deus- Walter. Grant v. .... . . ..... . ...... 594 more v.. ............ . .... . .... . . 747 Wanneker v. Hitchcock. .... . . ..... 383 Three Thousand Railroad Ties, The Warder, Gordon v ........... . . .. . 592 Mary Riley v. .... .. ..... . .... . . . . 254 Watkinds v. Southern Pac. R. Co. . 711 Tillery v. Bond.. .. .... . ........... 825 Weaver & Sterry v. Saltonstall. .... 493 Town of Lansing v. Lytle .......... 204 Wehrman, Conklin v ............... 874 Tracy v. Reed .... . . . . .... . . ....... 69 Weir, Keely v.. ........ . . .......... 291 Trenholm v. Commercial Nat. Bank 323 Welles v. Stout .... . ............... 67 Tuthill v. United States ............ 588 Welles v. Stout .... . . . . .... . ...... 807 Two Hundred and Three Thousand Wells City, The, Crawford v ...... . 47 Three Hundred and Ninety-Two lVestern Land & Emigration Co. v. Kilogrammes of Scrap·Iron, Schi- Guinault .... . ...... . ............. 287 adino v.._ .... . .... .. .... . ....... . 148 Western Union Tel. C0. v. City of New York. ...... . .............. 552 Ueberweg v. Compagnie Generale Western Union Tel. Co., Dixon v. . 377 . Transatlantique ................ . . 85 Westfield, The .... ‘ ...... . . . . ...... 366 Ullmann v. Hedden .... . . . .... . .... 9 Westfield, The, Roff v.. .... . ....... 366 United States v. Allen .... . ........ 736 Whelan v. New York, L. E. & W. United States v. Buskey. .... . .... .. 99 R. Co .... . . . . ...... . ............ . 15 United States v. Butler ............. 498 Whitely, Gordon v .......... . . ..... 592 United States v. Clarke .... . . 500 White’s Golden Lubricator C0., United States v. Clarke .... . . . .... 732 Leonard v.. .... . . .... . ........ .. . . 922 United States v. Costen .... . . . . .... 24 Whitman Saddle Co. v. Smith .... . . 414 United States v. Curtner .... . ...... 1 Wichelman, Hammerschlag Mau- United States v. Davis .... . ........ 326 uf'g Co. v .......... . .... . . .... . .. 430 United States v. De Goer ........... 80 Wight, United States v ............. 106 United States v. Edwards .......... 812 Wigton v. The Bombay ........ . .. . 512 _ United States v. Forty-Eight Pounds Wigton v. The Bomba]y ............ 863 of Rising Star Tea, etc .... .... 400 Willard, The Charles . .... . . .... . . 759 United States v. Harman ..... . ..... 827 William Fletcher, The, and The United States v. Purdy. ........ . . . . 902 Grapeshot, Greenwood v. . . . .... 156 United States v. Reeves ............ 404 William Powell Co., The, Seibert United States v. Scott .... . .. . . .... . 393 Cylinder Oi1—Cup C0. v ..... . . .... 600 United States v. Small .... . . . . .... 103 Wilson v. Fine ............ . .... . . . . 789 United States v. The Conserva ..... 431 Wilson Sewing—Machine C0., Sin- United States v. The Sidonian .... . . 440 ger Manuf’g C0. v.: ........... 1. . 586 United State v. Wight. ......... ... 106 Windsor Sav. Bank v. McMahon.. . 283 United States, Bliss v. . . . ........ . . 230 Witters v. Sowles ................ . . 700 United States, Hoyne v .... .. ...... 542 Worswick Manuf]: Co. v. City of United States, Rand v .... . .... . .... 665 Kansas. ......................... 239 United States, Southern Pac. R. Co. Wotherspoon v.Massacbusetts Ben. v ..... . .... . ............... ...... 55 Ass’n .... ..... . .............. 625 United States, Tuthill v. . . . ...... . . 538 Wurster, United States Axle Lubri- United States Axle Lubricator Co. cator Co. v. .... . .... .... . ..... 426 v. Wurster ....................... 426 Wylie, Howk v .... . ........... . .. . 865 United States Trust Co. v. Wabash Wylie, Kaitel v .... .. .... . .... . .... 865 W. Ry. Co .... . .. ................ 891 Wylie, Young v .......... . ...... 865 Upchurch, In re .... . . .... . . . . ..... 25 Wyman, Imperial Benning Co. v. .. 574 Vanaman v. The Algiers, two cases.. 526 Yale dz Towne Manuf'g Co. v. Con- solidated Time—Lock C0. .... . .... 917 Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. Co., Cen- Young v. Wylie. .... . .............. 865 tral Trust C0. v .... . . . . ........ . . 63 Wabash, St. L. & P. Ry. C0., Cen- Zambrino v. Galveston, H. & S. A. tral Trust C0. of New York v .... 561 Ry. Co. .... . . . . ...... . . ...... . . . . 449