4
` CASES REPORTED.
ARRANGED UNDER THEIR RESPECTIVE CIRCUITS
` AND DISTRIOTS.
I Page Page
.]-HRST C]QB(]U['_[‘_ Hogg I. The Pennsylvania Annex 620
- o. .............. . . . . ..........
Jones v. Smith .... . .......... . .... 380
DISTRICT CGUBT. D. MAINE. Igarkeg v. Dickinson . ....... . ...... 413
‘ i ' ' S · A L b ` .
4...4 .. umd sm. .... . ......... 665 *;%..3355.*. .   . }‘..T‘.‘?*E?.‘?f’. 426
CIRCUIT COURT, D. MABBACIIUSETPB. DISTRICT COURT, E_   NEW Y0BK_ .
Andrews v. Bacon ......... . ...... . 777 Al ' Th ..........   2
Bank at Hamburg v. Flynn ....   . 798 Buiféj Th; Hudson City ____ __ ____  
City <>f B<>¤i¤¤ v- Gwwiey --·- - -·-- 202 om MacLeod. The ..... ... ...... 447
G¤1?¤l€5’». III. T8· · ; · ·-··- _ -········ ; ·· 84 Compagnie Generale Transatlan-
MOTSS V- D0¤1€S'¤¤0 S€W1¤g·M¤Chm° tique v. The Switzerland ...... .. . 853
C0 ....   .... ...................48? Conserva. The. ......... . ..... .....431
Royer v. Coupe .. ... .... . . ·.·- · · · · 115 Crawford v. The 'Wells City. . . .... . 47
¥§g;;‘p;·0g<;¤Pg6{é&- »· ···· · - · · ····   gritng v.(A Caxrigo of Lumber. ...... 528
. ................ u80n ity, h€_ ______________"  
Tiggnnscn v- Rand-Avery Supply H2 {Ong o. stevens, The .... . . .. ...... 515
wme}`a'st飻§{'s£.i£6Aé£Ai1.ZIII 493 L§ud*‘iE°·%§§‘g_‘g_‘C:ajrg;.g glgdvglgé 853
. John G. Stevens. ........ . ....... 515
CIRCUIT GOURT' D_ NEW HAMPSHIRE_ Millard V. Tl1B Clalil _M3.CL60d... . . .. 447
` R.   Carter, The ................... 515
Fai]-bgpkg v_ Amggkgag NaI_ Bank 630 SWlCZBl'l3Dd, Tl1B . . . .. . : .. .. . . .. . . .  
Lang v. Lynch .... . .....   ....   489 Ummrweg v. Compagnie Generale 853
ransat antique ..................
United Statersjv. 'ghe Conserva ..... 431
. he 1giers,two cases.. 526
4 sneonn CIRCUIT. ““““““ "
- Cmcurr Comm-. N. D. Nmw Yom:.
Crnonm Comvr, D. Connmomoom. .
A Brewster v. Shuler ................. 549
Thomson .v. Smithéb Griggs Manuf g Consolidated Oil—Well Packer C0. v. '
Co ....   .... . .............. ....602 Galey .... ..   ...... .. ......  918
Whitman Saddle C0. v. Smith .... .. 414 Dennison v. Brown ............... . 535
Hurd v. Gere.. .; ................... 537
Mm com D- ¤¤¤¤M¤¤T— E¥§(§°$.v*ri`lgiS¤1§I$1.iffIICIIXIZIIIIQQZ 232
Mew *~ The Aww M The 2 6 l%5’JZ£.2§,}:.*I.‘1.‘Z§’i.i`£.‘..¥£.i£?..;.ze. 1;..; 2°‘
i e .... . . . ....... . .............. 5 · ·
I Ass’n.. ............ .. ....   .... 625
C C, . E.-D. N Y .
A IRTT 30;:T EW 0BK620 Cmcnvr Conwr. S. D. Nmw Your
nnex o. , e .... . .... . ........
Dickinson v. Banker.. ., ...... . ...... 411 Amy v. Manning., . , ...... .. . ...... 536
Ferguson v. Ross, two cases ....   161 Amy v. Manning. ...... . ..... ..... . 868
v.38F.——b (xiii)