xiv CASES REPORTED. S
Prize Page
Catskill, The ....................... 367 Marshall v. The Rio Grande and The
Clatlin v. Robertson ......, . . . . ..... 92 ' A. Demarest ............... . . .... 849
Conover v. The John S. Darcy. . . .. 619 Marvel v. The Scandinavia .... . ..... 36
Cornwall v. Davis .............. . . . . 878 Montgomery v. The Port Adelaide,. 753
Covert v Sargent .... . .. ........... 237 Philadelphia &: R. R. Co. v. City
Drucker v.ARobertson .............. 97 of New York .... . . . . ............ 159
Dueber Watch-Case Manuf’g Co. v. Pietro G., The ..... . ............... 148
Dalzell. . ........ . ............... 597 Port Adelaide. The ........... . .... 753
Edison v. Kaber .............  . . .... 744 Rio Grande. The ................... 849
ElectricalAccumnlator Co. v. Julien Rockaway, The. . . . ...... . . .... . . . . 856
· Electric C0 ........ . . ........ . . . . 117 Rolf v. The Westfield .... . . . .. . .... 366
Gilmore v. Anderson .... . ......   846 Ruddiman v. A Scow Platform .... 158
Grant v. Walter .................... 594 Schiailino v. Two Hundred and
Hatch v. The Newport ..... . ....... 669 Three Thousand Three Hundred
Heller v. Magone. ........ . . .. . . . 908 and Ninety—Two Kilogrammes of
Hohenstein v. Hedden .,......... . . . 94 Scrap-Iron .............. . . .. ..... 148
Hohorst v. Hamburg-Amer. Packet 973 Schulz v. The Pietro     ......... 148
Co ................... . ..... . .... . ~ Scott v. The Drew an he Came-
3Hollender v. Magoneh ....... . ..... 912 lia ............ . ..... . .... . .......  
lamb v. Robertson ...... . . . ...... . 16 Shaw v. Folsom ........ . . .... . ..... 35
Leggett v. Standard Oil Co .... . .... 842 Standard Oil Co, v. The Garden City 860
Levy v. Robertson ........... . ..... 714 United States v. De Goer. .... . . .... 80
Luckerneyer v. Ma one ...... . ..... 30 Westiield, The .... .. .... .. . . ....   366
` Mayer v. Denver,   & Ft. W. R.
tigris} Yiieddéiilff ICSI] I IIZYI CTI 13; “‘“°"" C°““T· D· VE“"‘°’"·
Morris v. Morris&CummingsDredg·- Loomis V Rummd R C0 280
l11g0D .... .......................776 Wittersvlsowlcs I ' lunuuqoo
Myers v. Theller ................... 607 ` T' '''‘'' ° " " ° ' " '
National Meter Co. v. Board of Wa-
Nter Comilrs of Yonkers ...........   `
ewport, he, .....................
New York. C. & A. Steam—Boat Co. THIRD CIRCUIT'
v. The Baltimore. .... . .......... _. 867
§tYL?t=€§i}!:.·. .€‘.YY; }?;?‘i·.Y;T'?‘? gg °¤w com- D- New Jerer-
aagano, nre ................... D _ gm L1 I S_ C _ ____   650
Phenix his- Ce- v- The Quaker City Fgwzleti v. Riiiibelria i1>e11ui’¤m nn-
‘ Mid The Iseheiie E- Wilbur -·--·- 153 ness Trimming Co ....   ....   739
Rubens v. Robertson ...... . ........ 86 Michagljs v_ ROSES1ct____ __________ 742
Streat v. Steiuam. . . .... . .......... 548
%’il‘.§3..`I; €YIh“$’.§‘.i’t.;::::::::; :1::::: iiié em-¤== emi- D- New inser-
Wakelee v. Davis . . . ........   878 Charles J- Willard, ThE` M · U U I · N · 759
Wallace v. Myers .............. . . .. 184
Western Union Tel. Co. v. City of Comgl St“m‘B°°*t C°· v· The H-
NBWYOrk_____"."..""".."'552   2.yEOI1...............· ......  
_ Ilfigrnan vaThe Leiogarg Igcherds. . '767
’ ` . . . t 926
D1¤·rm¤·r Germ. S- D- N EW Your-   vi8'll`h; Jessie Russel?   624
P .H h .... . ......... . . . . ....
A- Demereei. The -·-· - ·--··--···-·· 849 sgiisigs v?Tthe chimes J. Willard.. gg?
Baxter v. Heilner .... . . . . .... . . .... 668
6é’£ZT€”iiO.ii;i°rneI I I II} I II f21I IZ .` $82 Gieem COM- E- D- P-ENNSYMM
°1i§`Fc`€3SO£t.Ti1?..FY“.?`T°?i.Kiki'? an Feeei r- iiiisire-i.¤ Sieeiziierk Ce ---- 231
com V. The emma .... . ........ at Heeeid r- (-iedii Mebiher ei Amer- ,
Cornwall v. The New York ...... . . 710 NIT; ····   ······   · · ·   ···-······ 19°
Eastern & A. R. Co. v. The Alaska.. 764 BS IS v· . mgmc 1 mm gpo ······ 379
Greenwood v. The William Fletcher S· ‘ whim me C°· v· *b1°Y·   751
and The Grapeshot .............. 156
Henderson) v. Three Hundred Tons 36 Drsrnrer Cormr, E. D. PENNSYLVANIA.
o ron re .... . ............. . . . .
International, The ................. 856 Excelsior. The,v. The Bruce and The
Kalion Chemical Co. v. The Iroquois 151 Hamilton Fish. . . . .... . . . . .... . . . 271