xvi CASES REPORTED.
Page Page
SIXTH Q[B,(]U[’]‘_ Cmcmr Coun?. W. D. TENNEssEE.
Keely v. Weir., .... . ....... . .... . .. 291
· dmcmm Comvr, D. KENTUCKY. hcckhert yilhemphis & L. R. R. Co.  
oore v. 1 .... . . .... . . . .... . ....
Clay v. Swope .... . ....... . ....... . 396 United States v. Davis. . ........... 326
Walker v. 0’Nie11 .... . .. ........... 374
Drsrnrcrr Coeur, W. D. TENNESSEE.
· . . M . .
Cm`"" C°URT’ E D ICHIGAN cnicksssw, The ...... . ....... . .... 358
_ Burdett v. Doty. ...... . . . . .... . .... 491 Oggeil V- Memphis & W- R- P¤€k0li 358
Drsrmor Comvr. E. D. MICHIGAN.
Murphy v. Dunham .... . ...... . .... 503 SEVENTH CIRCUIT-
United States v. Butler. .... . ....... 498
United States v. Wight. ............ 106 CIRCUIT Comm N_ D_ ILLINOIS_
Crncnrr Comvr, W. D. MICHIGAN, S. D. gigglgfv?J°S€$1l;}§7v[°“S1°r *··· · · · ·  
h , M f, Hagedon v. Seeberger. . .. ......   . 401
Dznsmorg V- T *`°° Rl"" mm S 747 Harnmersohlag Mnnuf’g Co.v.Wich-
···· · •······-····•····· · -•···· ·· e main ...... . . .... . .... . .... . . . 430
Howk v. Wylie .... . ............... 865
Cxncmr Coeur, N. D. OHIO, E. D. §;i;§1v'·C¥Z;i§6—é·   6  ·é6·  
Imperial nenuangres. v. Wyman... em P·giq¤¤¤ Paige GM 00- V- Wasw
· Whelan v_ New Drk, L_ E_ & W_ zi. 8.06 Car Y0 .................... 416
R. Co .... . . . .... . . . .... . . . . ...... 15 §°§‘" "·vM§k“3’ ··········-··•·•··· 123
. o son . ary .... .. ......  
Schreiner v. Smith ................ 897
Cmcurr Comm-, S. D. Omo. Servis v. Marsh. .. .. . . .... . ...... . 794
Singer Manuf’g Co. v. Wilson Sew-
Leonaéd v. White’s Golden Lubrica.- 922 S ingBMechine  . . . . .. . . .. . .i· .... 586
tor 0 ..... ......... ....... .. .... mit v. (,ityo hics.g0........... 388
S rsgue v. Rosenbaum ............. 386
· \€anneker,v. Hitchcock.. . . .. .. . . .. 383
¤¤<¤¤¤¤ ¤<>¤M· S- D- <>¤¤<>· W- D- Young v. Wylie .................... sas
Edwards v. Hoeifinghoii .... . ...... 635
gmgon v_ ghampion Machine G0_ _ 53; DISTRICT Conmi, N. D. ILLINOIS.
. . .... . ............ 5
eg;.1g;:».vs?2$§r .... . ............ 592 Bradisy v- The J vim Pridgwn. Jr-. 261
Gordon v_ Whitely _________________ 592 Fisk v. Seeberger .......... . ....... 718
M L k y B ,,,_ _ 16 Home v United States 542
c‘los e v. arr .........   5 . - ·· ·· ····-·····
National Cable Ry_ (j0_ v_ ML Ad, Tuthill v. United States. . . . . . . .. . . . 538
sms & E. P. I. Ry. Ce ....., , ,,,__ 840 Walker v. S¤aberger... ....... ... . 724
§edweyCv.lO15io gevé; Cod ....   . 582
eibert yin er i-up o.v. e C 00 _])_] ·
wmasm Powsu oo. . ............ 600 mm UM Nm"N"‘
Y¤l6_& T0W¤p MM1¤Y`g C0- V- COD- Hoffman v. Manufacturers' Mut.
Uuhdatgd T1¤1¤·L¤<>k C0 -·-····- · · 917 Fire Ins. C0 ................. . . .. 487
Disrmcr Cormr, S. D. Omo, W. D, Cmcum Corman E. D. Wrscorxsm.
Armstrong v. Second Nat. Bank of Patchin v. Hunter ......... . .. ..... 51
Springfield ........ . .... . ......... 883
United tutes v. Purdy ............. 902 z
EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Crncurr Counr, E. D. TENNEssEE.
Thouron v. East Tennessee, V. & G. CIRCUIT COURT" E' D' ARKANSAS`
Ry. C0 .... . .... . ..... . . . . ........ 673 Jones v. Southern Ins. Co- ........ 19