9623 m1ma.•,L_ nmpomnn ,» vol. 53. issued against said defendants as nonresidents of the state, the same being levied on the realty known as the "Cor1nne Place." In this action, in due time, the plaintiff obtained judgment against the attached property, construct- ive serviceot tl1e,pen,dsn;:y of the, action having been giventojthe defendants therein, in accordance w t ' the provisions of the statutes of Arkansas. , On the 6th of January, 1891, Gatesinstituted a suit in equity in the circuit court of Jefferson county against Victor Meyer, Adolph `Meyer, and the Farmers' Lax1d,&_,Loan_,Qornpany, setting forth the 'fact of the issuance and service of the writ `ofattachnient, in the law actlpn,,_tl1e rendition of the judgment thereinyan ayerring that the conveyance ofthe realty by Victor Meyer to,t.l1e, ers' Land 8; Loan Company, as above stated, was a. fraud, and void as _ ',' ’said'g<`erdlnand Gates as a. creditor of said Victor Meyer, and praying“’that’ e `mlght be set asidcand canceled. Upon an application made when the bill, in equity was nled, to wit, on January 6, 1891, Gabe Meyer was appointéd‘jby·the circuit court of·JefEe1·son‘county receiver in said suit,` witl1,`authorlty`t0 take charge ofthe property involved iu the proceedings, to collect the rents coming therefrom, and otherwise care for the Same, '8hd;`CODSlQI*l1($fiVé 'seryide being made upon the nonresident defendants, t}1é·'¤¢gliI,plainant,`Dtoceéd(%··to‘ take testlnrony by depositions in. support of the allegations of his bill. ** ‘· the *16th day “of'Februa.ry,` 1892, Cl1ar1es,L. Bucki Bled a bill in equity in the United States circuit courtfor the eastern district or Arkansas against the Farmers' Land & Loan Company and‘Victor Meyer and Evelyn K. Meyer, wherein it was averred that the complainant was a ci’dzen'of’the` state of New*York,*the_defendants being citizens of the state ‘ 0`f“LduisianaL`·a.nd`tl1at,·con1pla1nant was the owner of the 16 coupon bonds issued by the*Farmers’ Land“& Loan company in part payment for the pur- chaseof the Corinne p1ace,·e,m1 which were securedby the mortgage included V in the provisions of the joint instrument executed by Victor Meyer and wife and the’Farmérs’ Land &’L0an Company under date of June 15, 1889; and that through the failure to pay théilnterest coupons the whole debt had been declared sto ,be due in pursuance to provisions to that effect contained in the mortgage given `to secure payment of the bonds, wherefore a foreclosure of the vendoifs and mortgage lien on said realty was prayed in due form. 011 the’16th of February;‘1892, the United States circuit court, upon the _ showing that the suit was for the foreclosure of a mortgage upon realty sit- uated within the distrlctrand that the defendants were nonresidents, upon whom personal, service could; not be made within the state of Arkansas, made an 1· for substituted em-vice, copies of which were duly served upon the named defendantsin the city of New Orleans, La., on the 23d of February, 1892. 0n· thee25th 0f,TFeb1·uary. 1892, thecomplainant `Bled an amendment t .- hisgbill, making Ferdinand Gates a defendant, averring that said Gates £a,ln1ed,_a‘HenA_up0n the mortgaged realty by reason of the attachment pro- edings inthe state court, but averrlng also that the lien, if any existed, was inferior to that of m¤~